Started By
Message
re: Big 6 Win%
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:20 am to BHMKyle
Posted on 10/6/19 at 9:20 am to BHMKyle
Meh,
The east has historically been pretty bad. I mean, how many times since 1992 has Vandy or Kentucky beaten UF or UGA? I mean, those two have not really been challenged in the last two decades (unless you count the gerry rigged Mizzou success under the "bridge" scheduling scenario.
If you count Tennessee's historically bad run in the last 20 years then it is even more pronounced. Missouri wasn't exactly a strong addition compared to A&M. South Carolina, despite great fans and a very good run by the old ball coach, is basically an average team.
Here is my take listed in 6 levels:
1
Bama
2
UF
UGA
LSU
Aub
3
A&M
4
Tenn
Ole Miss
Mizzou
Moo State
Arkansas- a current dumpster fire
South Carolina
5
Kentucky (pretty solid now)
6
Vandy
Another note, while the gumps have been VERY successful, they played Moo State exclusively in Tuscaloosa only for what...5 or 6 decades? I would imagine that they won most of those. Stuff like that skews something as simple as win percentage or total wins. Context matters imho.
To note Mark Twain:
There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.
The east has historically been pretty bad. I mean, how many times since 1992 has Vandy or Kentucky beaten UF or UGA? I mean, those two have not really been challenged in the last two decades (unless you count the gerry rigged Mizzou success under the "bridge" scheduling scenario.
If you count Tennessee's historically bad run in the last 20 years then it is even more pronounced. Missouri wasn't exactly a strong addition compared to A&M. South Carolina, despite great fans and a very good run by the old ball coach, is basically an average team.
Here is my take listed in 6 levels:
1
Bama
2
UF
UGA
LSU
Aub
3
A&M
4
Tenn
Ole Miss
Mizzou
Moo State
Arkansas- a current dumpster fire
South Carolina
5
Kentucky (pretty solid now)
6
Vandy
Another note, while the gumps have been VERY successful, they played Moo State exclusively in Tuscaloosa only for what...5 or 6 decades? I would imagine that they won most of those. Stuff like that skews something as simple as win percentage or total wins. Context matters imho.
To note Mark Twain:
There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News