jimmy the leg
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | bagels and tacos |
| Occupation: | bagel and taco inspector |
| Number of Posts: | 41630 |
| Registered on: | 8/4/2007 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: School in Oregon is running an LGBT club for 3rd and 4th graders.
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/12/25 at 3:59 pm to BoomerandSooner
Hank and SammyTiger approve of grooming (probably).
re: Michelle Obama: "Black female beauty is so powerful, we are owed respect"
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/12/25 at 3:57 pm to BoomerandSooner
What does that message have to do with him? I kid…maybe.


re: Gotta' Give Props to Chili's
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:21 pm to LSUtiger89
quote:
I don't care about race
quote:
Then proceeds to only talk about race. ????
He still ate there…so there is that.
Confusing, isn’t it?
re: Lawsuit is NOT about a breach of contract and NOT for damages (money)
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:13 pm to Gnash
quote:
Landry might actually be playing 4D chess here
That would make the seemingly moronic grandstanding about no taxpayer dollars being used for a coaches buyout prophetic.
It is a BAD look imho, but if that (supposed) stack of cash can be used for NIL, then whomever the next coach is will be a happy camper (provided his agent isn’t dumb enough to allow him to sign the same contract).
re: On what day did Jacques Doucet make this post about the morality clause?
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:08 pm to bayouboo
quote:
The state has obligations to pay a set amount for the life of the contract
FIFY
re: On what day did Jacques Doucet make this post about the morality clause?
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:08 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Now it seems LSU is screwed.
How so?
The state is on the hook for the contract.
LSU may have made out like a bandit.
BK may have to rely on the state to pay him what is owed.
Good luck with that.
re: You need evidence to allege "termination for cause" or else it's defamation.
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:05 pm to metafour
quote:
You realize that trying this play would make any future coaching contract you put in front of a coaching candidate worth less than the price of the paper, right?
If it’s the same contract - yes.
What kind of an agent would allow for that?
Those “loopholes” have been exposed.
I can’t see them being in future contracts.
re: Power, Politics, and the Fall of Scott Woodward
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 8:02 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Kirby Smarts buyout is $105 million ffs.
Does he get it all if he decides to just up and leave?
Not all contracts are the same, even if the amounts are all crazy.
re: Lawsuit is NOT about a breach of contract and NOT for damages (money)
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:52 pm to OceanMan
quote:
He provided an opening for it to end with a termination for cause and a battle with the state over the damages.
I think people are missing this part.
The lawsuit is against the state.
If the state loses…he has to (somehow) extract that money from them.
That means the money people STILL have that cash readily available.
If I misunderstood the current circumstances, tell my where I’m wrong.
re: Lawsuit is NOT about a breach of contract and NOT for damages (money)
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:50 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Kelly really doesn't want a protracted lawsuit. He knows LSU can't afford one in the court of public opinion while conducting a new coaching search.
quote:
This is way riskier than I think you are appreciating it to be.
As I understand it, this puts the responsibility on paying his contract in the hands of the state.
That frees up millions (if not tens of millions) in private funds to go get a new coach / NIL.
If I have understood correctly…
BK is fricked
and
LSU is stacked
ETA - Sexton won’t allow for these loopholes to exist in any contract signed by a coach he represents.
re: Lawsuit is NOT about a breach of contract and NOT for damages (money)
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:45 pm to FWBTigah
quote:
I'll add to it.... also someone who is owed all of his buyout if he wants it
Owed by whom?
The state?
Good luck.
re: It's all on Woodward
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:41 pm to kajunman
quote:
Technically there isn't a 10 year absurd deal without SW.
That is unknown. It could have happened with another AD at the helm.
No matter, any agreement that he brokered still had to subsequently approved.
Firings, on the other hand, have to be approved by the BOS before he can act.
He doesn’t have total hire / fire capability (even if his recs are typically followed).
re: It's all on Woodward
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:38 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
He is also responsible for Jay Johnson
A grand slam hire.
However, this current clusterfrick rests solely at his feet.
How could he not know what the limits of his authority were?
re: Somebody Catch Me Up On Terminating Kelly For Cause
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:12 pm to IOU
quote:
BK can either agree to a settlement and be free to pursue other opportunities or he'll be tied to LSU for the next 6 years same as coach O. BK will get paid. Just
a matter of how soon.
Why would LSU settle?
The judgement (assuming that there is one) will come from the state.
I just can’t see the legislature ponying up.
Additionally, BK may have a skeleton or two in the closet.
That info is going to come out (if it exists).
I don’t see the upside for him here.
Supposedly he turned down 30 million, and followed that up with this lawsuit.
In short, LSU boosters may have saved bank, but can they get another coach to come in after this (potential) legal sleight of hand?
re: Somebody Catch Me Up On Terminating Kelly For Cause
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:08 pm to paulb52
quote:
If it was for cause the steps to fire him were not followed so it’s moot. Too bad.
Which steps is that.
Woodward didn’t have the authority to fire him without BOS approval.
To my knowledge, that didn’t happen.
He is STILL being paid (or was until very recently).
re: You need evidence to allege "termination for cause" or else it's defamation.
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 7:06 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
LSU is going to wind up paying Kelly more than $53 million.
Only in theory.
The state of Louisiana will be on the hook.
Good luck getting a dime.
re: Trump welcomes Muslim terrorist to White House
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/11/25 at 6:12 am to Bama Mountain
Speaking of welcoming terrorists…
you have never denounced Charlie Kirk’s assassination, despite MULTIPLE opportunities to do so.
Just admit that you support acts of violence.
It’s okay, everyone here knows that you are a goose-stepper.
The left is vile and violent…and you and you ilk support those that are violent.
you have never denounced Charlie Kirk’s assassination, despite MULTIPLE opportunities to do so.
Just admit that you support acts of violence.
It’s okay, everyone here knows that you are a goose-stepper.
The left is vile and violent…and you and you ilk support those that are violent.
re: I'm a SNAP recipient
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/10/25 at 6:06 am to SNAP
quote:
I think most people on SNAP simply need it and are grateful for it
I don’t agree.
I would suggest that most know that they are scamming, and are more than okay with doing so.
quote:
This is all I really intend to post here at this site. I may respond to this topic, though.
Were you paid you to post here?
How did you find out about “this site?”
Not even naming “this site” is a red flag for me. It suggests that you have flooded any site possible with your diatribe (if what you wrote is even remotely true).
Given those attributes , your post reeks of scam artist.
re: BBC director-general resigns after misleading editing of Donald Trump speech
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/9/25 at 8:39 pm to BoomerandSooner
In this case, the BBC was literally…


re: Deal has been reached to reopen the gov
Posted by jimmy the leg on 11/9/25 at 7:56 pm to Bama Mountain
You have never denounced Charlie Kirk’s assassination, despite MULTIPLE opportunities to do so.
Just admit that you support acts of violence.
It’s okay, everyone here knows that you are a goose-stepper.
The left is vile and violent…and you and you ilk support those that are violent.
Just admit that you support acts of violence.
It’s okay, everyone here knows that you are a goose-stepper.
The left is vile and violent…and you and you ilk support those that are violent.
Popular
0












