Started By
Message
re: Looking back....A&M vs Texas in the SEC.........update p 26
Posted on 9/22/19 at 10:20 pm to lewis and herschel
Posted on 9/22/19 at 10:20 pm to lewis and herschel
It would have been a bad idea to take OU, though while Big 10 took Rutgers and Maryland, and I suppose that's why we took aTm.
You can't have 2, 3, or 4 national contenders in the same comference every year. That helps the perception, but hurts the results.
You can't have 2, 3, or 4 national contenders in the same comference every year. That helps the perception, but hurts the results.
1
Posted on 9/23/19 at 6:26 am to dstone12
quote:
It would have been a bad idea to take OU
So you want the SEC to take texas but not OU?
Sounds like something a texas alter would say.
quote:
You can't have 2, 3, or 4 national contenders in the same conference every year.
Has worked for the SEC for generations. Steel sharpens steel. The SEC has become the best conference across multiple sports by having depth in each sport.
quote:
That helps the perception, but hurts the results.
Really?
Longhorn Network has been a disaster
PACN has been a disaster
BTN is behind the SECN
ACCN has programming nobody wants to watch for lack of depth
Why don't you wander back to your B12 boards and watch texas become a mid major while TAMU and MU fund major upgrades across all their sports to accommodate more fan interest in their new homes.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News