Started By
Message

Georgia football reports three secondary recruiting violations

Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:07 am
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12834 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:07 am
LINK

Georgia's compliance office reported three secondary recruiting violations to the NCAA in March and April. Those self-reported violations came prior to the dismissal of one recruiting support staffer and the suspension and eventual resignation of another.

According to information obtained by Dawgs247 via an open records request under the Freedom of Information Act, the violations occurred in the months of March and April, prior to the firing of recruiting program coordinator Dacia King in late April and the suspension of Lukman Abdulai, UGA's director of on-campus recruiting. Abdulai was placed on suspension for a month without pay and ultimately resigned his post.

Abdulai had been with the program for six years and helped aid the coaching staff overhaul between Mark Richt and Kirby Smart.

J. Reid Parker Director of Athletics Greg McGarity has elected not to comment when asked about the two staffers, stating that he doesn't discuss personnel matters. Smart has responded similarly when asked.

According to UGA's official website, the program has since hired former Vanderbilt recruiting staff member, as the director of recruiting operations.
No names were mentioned in the documents obtained by 247Sports but one violation was reported on April 29 relating to impermissible entertainment. An "institutional staff member" escorted a student-athlete to the sideline for a couple of minutes during the Bulldogs' G-Day Spring Scrimmage, which is against NCAA rules. That staffer was not allowed to participate in on-campus recruiting activities for 30 days.

A pair of violations were also reported the month prior on March 8. One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete. That resulted in a violation because the student worker isn't allowed to have recruiting duties. The full-time support staffer was reprimanded via a letter for allowing the student worker to host the recruit and said student worker was banned participating in any events where recruits were present and placed in an office role for the remainder of the 2018-2019 school year.
The other March 8 violation was related to a member of the coaching staff providing a video to the parent of a recruit who wasn't able to accompany the student-athlete on the visit. The video was "personalized" per the report, making it a violation.

The violating member of UGA's coaching staff was forbidden to have contact with that recruit for 30 days after the infraction was reported, including text messages, phone calls, and off-campus visits during the spring evaluation period. UGA also took away two spring evaluation days for said staff member.

All three of the violations were tagged with the Level III label, which means they were unintentional, isolated, and didn't provide a major recruiting advantage.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86584 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:10 am to
quote:

One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete. That resulted in a violation because the student worker isn't allowed to have recruiting duties.


what I want to know in this unbelievably minor things like this is how they are even found out?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61013 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:18 am to
We're still self-reporting this inane shite?
Posted by Mad Dawg 2020
Member since Jun 2017
732 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:20 am to
I don't usually follow these tiny violations closely so forgive me if this is a stupid question.

What, if any, punishments are usually handed down for these types of infractions?
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 11:54 am to
quote:

An "institutional staff member" escorted a student-athlete to the sideline for a couple of minutes during the Bulldogs' G-Day Spring Scrimmage, which is against NCAA rules.

quote:

One of those was related to a student worker who escorted a recruit from check-in to his seat and spent five minutes with the prospective student athlete.

quote:

The other March 8 violation was related to a member of the coaching staff providing a video to the parent of a recruit who wasn't able to accompany the student-athlete on the visit. The video was "personalized" per the report, making it a violation.


Jesus christ sometimes NCAA regulations are just ridiculous.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter