Started By
Message

re: Running Back Recruiting

Posted on 6/4/19 at 1:03 pm to
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23156 posts
Posted on 6/4/19 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Rivals/247 at least are very focused on the recruiting side of the business. They can disagree on ratings but at least it feels like they had some human at least look at the footage for the top 200 or so.



Yea but the problem is, to have a composite, it's better if there are 3+ services right. If it's just Rivals and 247 then the composite is basically already useless. It was a better tool when Scout was around, so it had 4 sources of info (making ESPN's part of the equation smaller). I agree ESPN is the worst, but I'd rather they had 8 groups of rankings and took a composite since different "experts" will see different things
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 6/4/19 at 1:12 pm to
Yeah... I'm not arguing that ESPN should go away... More sources would definitely be better. Just unfortunate that they suck at it so badly...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter