Started By
Message

re: Why won't Alabama schedule a home-and-home?

Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

The problem here is that you're going by final rankings.


No, its not the problem at all. Are you saying preseason rankings are more accurate than Final rankings? That's absurd.

quote:

Nobody can predict that any of them will have a bad(ish) year during that exact season. The fault here lies not in the team but in the stars.


If we were having a discussion about which team *intends* to schedule difficult opponents, then you would have a point. But that is not what we were discussing.

I said that the committee has proven that Bama does not have to play a difficult OOC schedule in order to get every benefit of the doubt. The committee is looking at what a team did that year.... they don't give 2 cents about the intent of a schedule. They are looking at how good those teams are that year, and what each team's resume looks like that year.

quote:

While the fact that they did have poor showings isn't up for debate, the assignation of blame/motives for the schedule certainly is.


No one is blaming anyone. The fact of the matter is Bama has played a relatively weak OOC schedule most years in which Saban has been there, and it has not affected their resume with voters or with the committee.

And Bama is not the only program that has played some bigger name opponents that turned out to be mediocre.

Since '07, despite playing Georgia Tech every single year, Georgia has played Arizona State (2x), Oklahoma State (2x), North Carolina.... every single one of them finished outside the Top 25.

Bama is not the only one its happening to.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

No, its not the problem at all. Are you saying preseason rankings are more accurate than Final rankings? That's absurd.



Um, no. The text of my comment made what I was saying very clear.

quote:

If we were having a discussion about which team *intends* to schedule difficult opponents, then you would have a point. But that is not what we were discussing.



quote:

No one is blaming anyone. The fact of the matter is Bama has played a relatively weak OOC schedule most years in which Saban has been there, and it has not affected their resume with voters or with the committee.



Oh bullshite. You're a good poster. Don't try that cheap plausible deniability thing. The entire premise of this thread revolves around whether a team is afraid to schedule certain games. As I said, in final analysis, many of these programs had bad years, but in the context of this thread, intention is absolutely relevant to the discussion.
Posted by harmonics
Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2010
18647 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

And Bama is not the only program that has played some bigger name opponents that turned out to be mediocre.
quote:

Bama is not the only one its happening to.


Ok... So then what is your point?
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

No one is blaming anyone


Wait, Really?
Posted by thatthang
Member since Jan 2012
6788 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

At this point, why should they schedule anyone difficult?


-BHMKyle, this thread

quote:

If we were having a discussion about which team *intends* to schedule difficult opponents, then you would have a point. But that is not what we were discussing.


-BHMKyle, this thread

It appears as though you have no fricking clue what we are discussing. As we can all see above you have shifted the argument from a focus on intention going into a game, to a focus on how the results of the games were perceived retroactively.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter