Started By
Message

Inaugural Sugar Bowl Hall of Fame
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:02 am
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:02 am
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:03 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Sugar Bowl hates LSU
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:05 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
No LSU players selected by the New Orleans-based (thus LSU-hating) Sugar Bowl committee, but Tulane gets a guy selected. Only Alabama has more Sugar Bowl appearances than LSU, but, of course, Archie Manning gets selected.
Even when you consider they didn't select anyone before 1984 (outside of Gene Stallings), no Billy Cannon? Seriously?
Even when you consider they didn't select anyone before 1984 (outside of Gene Stallings), no Billy Cannon? Seriously?
This post was edited on 12/13/17 at 10:07 am
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:05 am to craigbiggio
George Teague? Can't have a better game than he did in '92.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:06 am to craigbiggio
Probably do, for financial reasons. Tourism in a slow tourist time is main objective
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:07 am to phaz
quote:
Probably do, for financial reasons. Tourism in a slow tourist time is main objective
I was joking but you are right, it goes both ways too. I'm still pissed we didn't get the Rose Bowl in 06
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:08 am to roger79
Cannon should have gotten in.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:09 am to phaz
quote:
Probably do, for financial reasons. Tourism in a slow tourist time is main objective
Some of it is for financial reasons. The Sugar Bowl was pretty open in the '80s about how, all things being equal, they'd prefer other SEC teams than LSU because LSU fans wouldn't stay in hotels. And I understand that part, and I don't blame them. They took Auburn in '88 when LSU shared the title and beat Auburn. But Auburn was higher ranked, had a better overall record and would bring more overnight tourist money. I don't have a problem with that at all.
But you can bet there are people involved with the Sugar Bowl with Tulane ties who hate LSU. Even Archie hates LSU, and you know he has his say, being God's gift to New Orleans, despite his horrific record as a Saints quarterback. And don't blame that record all on the team around him. He was responsible for some of those failures, too.
This post was edited on 12/13/17 at 10:11 am
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:09 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
No Ezekiel Elliott or Brian Johnson?
List is shite
List is shite
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:10 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
They did set a limit of 16 inductees.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:14 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Saban could be on this list if his Bama teams didn't consistently shite the sugar bowl bed.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:18 am to BranchDawg
It's pretty obvious they took players/coaches from the earlier days.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:19 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Gaynell Tinsley should have been in the first class.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:19 am to McGregor
quote:
George Teague? Can't have a better game than he did in '92.
I'd put him as the second most glaring omission from Alabama.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:20 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Does the broken body of Hawaii QB Colt Brennan get an In Memoriam entry?
Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:35 am to VoxDawg
Look, I'm as big of a Major Ogilvie fan as you can find but to include him while omitting Krauss and Teague?

Posted on 12/13/17 at 10:45 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
No Tebow? Surprised. His performance vs Cincy was ridiculous.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 11:11 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Josh Reed went for 14-239 2 TD on some All-America DBs. Should have been on there.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 12:36 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
I wonder if any State players were considered...
Posted on 12/13/17 at 12:39 pm to roger79
quote:
Even when you consider they didn't select anyone before 1984 (outside of Gene Stallings), no Billy Cannon? Seriously?
why should Billy Cannon be in the Sugar Bowl HOF? I won't comment on Josh Reed, Rohan Davey, or Justin Vincent given no players were selected after the early 80s
Popular
Back to top
