Which was my point. So, you agreed with my point. Then, argued about how that's good, which is irrelevant to the conversation.

I was bored when I started this, but it's becoming tedious now.

And, no Boz, those statements are the same, and "we only use Ridley" is exactly what I meant.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Funky Tide 8

Bayou Chico

Member since Feb 2009

53441 posts

Posted on 11/13/17 at 11:01 am to Teague

quote:
I was bored when I started this,

I mean, I think that we obviously got each others points from the get-go, I am not sure why you insisted on dragging shite out.

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by SECSolomonGrundy

Slaughter Swamp

Member since Jun 2012

16511 posts

Posted on 11/13/17 at 11:08 am to Teague

I kinda agree with what you're saying. Of course any person with eyes sees that we do indeed throw to more receivers than just Calvin Ridley. But, the point, I think, is that we don't really "USE" them in terms of game planning.

Ideally, IMO, the passing game should feature Ridley and feed him until teams take it away by putting two guys on him. When teams take Ridley away, we have other WRs who should be able to really hurt the defense. We should have more "counter punches" in the game plan to take advantage of the other young WRs.

Right now, Jalen's counter punch if the defense takes away Ridley is to run. If the coaches can make pulling the ball down and running his third read instead of his second, then the offense will really take off. And they probably are coaching him that way right now, but he's still rushing through the second read or not trusting it and just taking off.

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Alabama Sports Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board