re: What our offense is missing...

quote:

---

Contradicting how? Your comment was meant in a figurative, or hyperbolic way, and I still disagree with it even on that level. I have said what "I meant to say" since page 1 of this thread.

---

Then you need some help with your debate skills. You're not following logically.

Original thread topic: We need a WR who does other things.

Me: We have lots of great WR's. We're just not using them.

You: Hurts passed to 5 guys on Saturday.

Me: I wasn't talking about one game.

You: It doesn't matter. Your point is bad.

Me: My point was we're only using one WR. How is that point wrong?

You: Now I'll admit we're only using one WR, but he's the best one, so it's a good thing.

Me: So, are we only using one or not?

You: I sense a trap. You should have said we use Ridley more, not exclusively.

Me: You thought I literally meant we only threw the ball to one WR ever?

You: It doesn't matter what you said or meant, you're wrong.

Me: Can you explain that?

You: We don't just use one. We do use Ridley a lot more, but that's good.

Me: So, you thought I literally meant we only throw the ball to one WR ever?

You: I know what you mean, but you're wrong.


Then, more rehashing of the same.