Started By
Message
re: How Would TCU Finish This Year If They Were In The SEC?
Posted on 9/12/17 at 7:13 pm to CharlotteSooner
Posted on 9/12/17 at 7:13 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Oklahoma played Nebraska, and Texas
Calling Nebraska a "blue blood" is a stretch. Take out the 90s, and they have two titles to their name.
Also, one has to question the "toughness" of their conference when they're #2 in winning %, but a losing bowl record. Nebraska padded some stats there my friend.
2
Posted on 9/12/17 at 7:18 pm to skrayper
I totally agree but for different reasons
No blue blood programs turns into a minnow and turns tail and run.
Once Nebraska ran away from the Big XII and blamed all their problems on UT and OU then their blue blood status was revoked.
Regarding the Big 8 I believe CU's ability to win in the PAC 12 disproves this now. I think last year it would have been different but CU is one of the Top 5 teams in the PAC 12 now.
Missouri winning the SEC East Title two years in a row
No blue blood programs turns into a minnow and turns tail and run.
Once Nebraska ran away from the Big XII and blamed all their problems on UT and OU then their blue blood status was revoked.
Regarding the Big 8 I believe CU's ability to win in the PAC 12 disproves this now. I think last year it would have been different but CU is one of the Top 5 teams in the PAC 12 now.
Missouri winning the SEC East Title two years in a row
Posted on 9/12/17 at 7:30 pm to skrayper
quote:
Calling Nebraska a "blue blood" is a stretch. Take out the 90s, and they have two titles to their name.
And why do you think that is?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News