re: Parrish out 4 weeks with a foot injury*

quote:

---

I equated it as a "foot" injury because, while JT3 did have a sprained ankle, I think we all saw the writing on the wall that the ankle came at just about the time everyone was clamoring for Stafford and that ankle stayed bad the rest of the season apparently because you don't lose your starting position due to injury they say...but JT3 never came back and let's face it, the ankle is pretty close to the foot. So, for a bit of wild speculation, it wasn't so far off. It's not like I said "foot" when he actually had a broken arm.

---

Good Lord man do you hear yourself? None of what you've posted about this situation is correct, like at all.

-First of all, I didn't think someone calling you out on the "foot injury" was about you naming the wrong body part, it was about the fact that the guy sprained his fricking ankle. It's an actual injury, not some behind the scenes ploy to cut his PT.
-Your notion is completely idiotic from the outset. You think we had some sort of agreement to pull the senior JT for a the TFr sipmly because he was more talented? Did you forget stafford threw for 170 yards, 0 TD/3 INT that day?
-The next week, your savior threw for barely over 100 yards to friggin UAB
-The next week, he threw for 76 yards (!!!) in 3 quarters and got us down by 2 TDs to a bad colorado team. It was the other freshman that had to come in and save us.
-He was promptly benched the following week..for the other freshman
-Then when the senior was finally healthy again, he rightfully regained his starting spot because he deserved it at the time.


Your idea that we have potentially "made up" this injury to Parrish in order to give a younger guy PT is flat out absurd. It defies all logic and rational thinking.