Started By
Message
re: The Joker Tape - Yes it is bad news
Posted on 6/9/17 at 2:35 pm to peepingcrxxms
Posted on 6/9/17 at 2:35 pm to peepingcrxxms
On the other hand, you could say that the NCAA accepting a shaky (at best) testimony as fact during the "immunity interviews" that changed every time the story was told, would be a bad look. That could bring all out warfare regarding immunity interviews with even the tiniest shred of evidence against an institution.
3
Posted on 6/9/17 at 2:42 pm to RebBearShark
quote:
the NCAA accepting a shaky (at best) testimony as fact during the "immunity interviews
Honest question, because I'm not reading any more of this response until the actual COI meets.
Who is reporting the disparities in the #39 interviews?
Didn't Ole Miss complain that they were not allowed access to #39 in order to interview him? Why would the NCAA include testimony that is full of holes in an official NOA?
Maybe #39 did change his testimony, but how do we know this?
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 6/9/17 at 2:51 pm to RebBearShark
Or you could, you know, actually read the NOA and see that the NCAA is not just accepting that as fact without a shite load of evidence to support his testimony. You know, the fact that your coach set him up with a booster. Or the fact that Leo successfully pointed out the car and physical appearance of the alleged booster. Or the fact that there is a text message confirming the booster took care of Leo. Or the fact that your boosters met Leo on several occasions.
Or, you could just continue to stick your head in the sand.
Or, you could just continue to stick your head in the sand.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 3:22 pm to RebBearShark
quote:
On the other hand, you could say that the NCAA accepting a shaky (at best) testimony as fact during the "immunity interviews" that changed every time the story was told, would be a bad look. That could bring all out warfare regarding immunity interviews with even the tiniest shred of evidence against an institution.
You do realize that had OM not continued to cheat after the NCAA had been on campus for 4 years Leo would have never been offered immunity or interviewed. I just am trying to wrap my head around how every single Ole Miss fan is blind to the fact that you basically spit in the NCAA's face and said you won't do sh** to us.
Then when it finally hits the fan you try and blame everything on a school and player that is supposedly not your "rival" while there are apparently 38 other students that were named, hence the student 39. That means they have stuff from or on 38 other student athletes that were involved in some way shape or form. How are you getting out of this again?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News