Started By
Message
Top 10 SEC "National Champions" that aren't "recognized" widely by many
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:21 am
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:21 am
I'm sure this will be a nice,civil thread. 
1. 1966 Alabama
2. 2004 Auburn
3. 1960 Ole Miss
4. 1983 Auburn
5. 1945 Alabama
6. 1967 Tennessee
7. 1962 Ole Miss
8. 1984 Florida
9. 1975 Alabama
10. 1977 Alabama
1. 1966 Alabama
2. 2004 Auburn
3. 1960 Ole Miss
4. 1983 Auburn
5. 1945 Alabama
6. 1967 Tennessee
7. 1962 Ole Miss
8. 1984 Florida
9. 1975 Alabama
10. 1977 Alabama
13
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:21 am to I-59 Tiger
Bama tops yet another poll.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:24 am to I-59 Tiger
Aside from #s 3, 6, and 7, these "championships" aren't even recognized by the schools that "won" them.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 10:38 am
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am to LSU Patrick
21-0 won't change
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am to LSU Patrick
Lsu won't be topping any poll anytime soon with the shite you just hired.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:26 am to I-59 Tiger
Football started in 2000 so most of these make sense
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:27 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
5. 1945 Alabama
Should be #1. That team dominated the competition that year. I remember doing some research in the Bryant Museum when I was a student there and seeing numerous contemporary newspaper articles practically begging Alabama and Army to play each other in the Sugar Bowl. When Army declined to play in a post-season bowl, Alabama accepted a Rose Bowl invitation.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:28 am to TT9
Top SECr Worn Out and Unsubstantiated Comments
1)
2)
Congrats. You gumps are the best.
1)
quote:
21-0 won't change.
2)
quote:
Lsu won't be topping any poll anytime soon with the shite you just hired.
Congrats. You gumps are the best.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 10:29 am
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:28 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
2. 2004 Auburn
A bigger robbery than the Brinks heist
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:29 am to LSU Patrick
1 fact and 1 soon to be proven a fact.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:34 am to TT9
Baw Orgeron gonna catch all the sheephead
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:35 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
A bigger robbery than the Brinks heist
If USC had beaten Oklahoma 28-24 instead of 55-19, no one would be talking about '04 Auburn. The only reason why it remains a discussion in SEC circles is because of how the Sooners got run out of the stadium that night.
The fact of the matter is, USC and Oklahoma began the season #1 and #2 respectively. They finished their seasons undefeated. Had Auburn not disappointed so epically in 2003, they might have been able to sneak into the national championship picture in 2004.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 10:37 am
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:37 am to RollTide1987
quote:
If USC had beaten Oklahoma 28-24 instead of 55-19, no one would be talking about '04 Auburn. The only reason why it remains a discussion in SEC circles is because of how the Sooners got run out of the stadium that
Well and the fact that USC was using bought players.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:41 am to Tiger3048
Fair point.
LSUpatrick, truth hurts.. it's funny that some of y'all claim that had y'all won it all that year it would be best team ever, yet couldn't cross the 50.. ouch
LSUpatrick, truth hurts.. it's funny that some of y'all claim that had y'all won it all that year it would be best team ever, yet couldn't cross the 50.. ouch
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:46 am to I-59 Tiger
Bama does not claim any of those titles because, as I always have to point out, Bama only claims titles after WWII that were awarded by either AP or UPI just like every school in the country
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:48 am to I-59 Tiger
Alabama 2011
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:49 am to RollTide1987
quote:
If USC had beaten Oklahoma 28-24 instead of 55-19, no one would be talking about '04 Auburn. The only reason why it remains a discussion in SEC circles is because of how the Sooners got run out of the stadium that night. The fact of the matter is, USC and Oklahoma began the season #1 and #2 respectively. They finished their seasons undefeated. Had Auburn not disappointed so epically in 2003, they might have been able to sneak into the national championship picture in 2004.
Why would nobody be talking about arguably the best SEC team of the BCS era, just because OU hadn't gotten blown out?
And why does what happened in a completely different year matter to a different year? Oh yeah, I forgot... polls selecting championship games.
Lol, Sagarin.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:50 am to bamawriter
quote:
Aside from #s 3, 6, and 7, these "championships" aren't even recognized by the schools that "won" them.
yet 3 6 and 7 are more valid than several that Bama claims. imagine that
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:50 am to TigahJay
quote:
Alabama 2011
By far the biggest travesty of the BCS era.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:51 am to bama will rise again
quote:A: That's not accurate
yet couldn't cross the 50
B: It also doesn't change the fact that between our two teams in 8+ quarters, exactly 1 TD was scored, and it was in the last quarter we played that year in garbage time.
-
We were the best two teams that year by a wide margin. As an LSU fan, I wish we had played Okie St in the final game. We would have destroyed them and yes, bc of our schedule that year, we would've had a legit claim to the best ever. But I knew after the first game we were the two best teams in the country.
10 fg
1 TD
2+ games
That was some crazy good defense by both teams
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News