Started By
Message

re: 2018 UGA Recruiting Thread (commits, offers, visits, etc.) - Back to that #1 class

Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42739 posts
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:34 pm to
Doesn't really bother me to see some of the players drop. Not really sure how Cook's was warranted, but I can understand Mays' drop. Hopefully it motivates them. The only thing that would be dumb would be them dropping players to try and create more interest on February 2nd instead of us already having the #1 class locked up, but I don't think that's the case.

eta: Also think they made a fair point with Lawrence and Fields. If Fields would have played in the UA game and looked good he could have taken over the #1 spot. Hard to reward someone for not playing in a game...


ya know, unless it's Bama in the SECCG (I might be bitter still )
This post was edited on 1/18/18 at 12:43 pm
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:36 pm to
Tindall just got a 5th star!!
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

The only thing that would be dumb would be them dropping players to try and create more interest on February 2nd instead of us already having the #1 class locked up, but I don't think that's the case.

Very likely the case imo.

16 of UGA's 22 commits are now ranked lower by 247 than they are on the composite. Only 4 are ranked higher. That seems unlikely to me. It's a business so I don't really blame them.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/18/18 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Doesn't really bother me to see some of the players drop.

Not really the point. It's just the inconsistency of it all. As I said elsewhere, our coaches don't (nor do I terribly) give a shite what the recruiting sites rank these kids. They feel good about the evals they've done and the talent they're bringing in.

I agree on Mays as well. His senior season didn't warrant unanimous 5* rating in all likelihood. Cook on the other hand seems to be an attempt to ensure that he doesn't end up a composite 5* since he was close. Nothing about his play justifies a 20 spot drop in the rankings, when the discussion coming out of the AA game was not only that he excelled in his role, but that he may have been the best *receiver* in the game period. As an APB, that is a pretty substantial component of the role that he's been rated for. Dropping him because he "doesn't run inside" or "seek out contact" is like grading a sprinter on their ability to run a half marathon... It's simply not what is expected out of him, nor was he asked to do it...

As to the Lawrence/Fields situation, I do understand the point, but in that scenario, then you're saying the AA game shouldn't really count, except 2 years prior Eason was shuffled back in the pack due to a *less* poor outing than Lawrence had. He looked downright bad against quality competition... While I understand the AA games are tough to get a read, he looked uncomfortable. Additionally, dropping Zamir, arguably one of the most productive HS RBs that we've seen in a long time - not accomplished on volume but on efficiency - drops 7 spots after an injury, but Ja'Marr Chase tears his PCL and hasn't played since then, but drops 1 spot. Much like my officiating... I like my recruiting rankings to have some consistency. Unfortunately, for us... neither are likely.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter