I cannot call this line of attack by A&M stupid because considering the color of most of the recurits if the label can be stuck it could be irreversible

Problem is if A&M wants to start throwing about the racist label a true look at each university should be done to see if A&M represents multiculturalism
more than UT

If I was A&M I would be very worried about this coming back to bite them in the arse

The image of A&M has not changed since the 50's

While the image of UT is always changing

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Texas Weazel

Louisiana is a shithole

Member since Oct 2016

8563 posts

Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:29 am to TheMajor

quote:
The image of A&M has not changed since the 50's

Yes. It's still an all male, all white, corps only cow college.

Que pendejo!

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TbirdSpur2010

ALAMO CITY

Member since Dec 2010

134026 posts

Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:32 am to TheMajor

quote:
if A&M wants to start throwing about the racist label a true look at each university should be done to see if A&M represents multiculturalism
more than UT

We hired a black HC coach first. Also, we continue to give him a fair shake.

Also, no affirmative action. We believe minorities in the state of Texas are smart enough to earn their way into the halls of academe, not needing to be coddled and told they're not good enough on their own.

quote:
The image of A&M has not changed since the 50's

Only an idiot who has not seen TAMU since the 50s would type this.

Also, speaking of the 50s, was that, perhaps, when you graduated from texas? Also, what was your degree field?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by FishFearMe

United States

Member since Jul 2015

7196 posts

Posted on 12/6/16 at 1:32 am to TheMajor

quote:
While the image of UT is always changing

Yes the tu image is pretty shitty with top boosters undermining Strong from day one and getting him fired after 3 seasons.

What is the difference between McWilliams who got 5 years and Strong who got 3? (Hint, it isn't results on the field).