Started By
Message

re: TOS: Trump will not "lock her up"

Posted on 11/22/16 at 4:49 pm to
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 11/22/16 at 4:49 pm to
Without getting into the merits of it, she still got cleared twice by the FBI. That's more than enough to establish "reasonable doubt" assuming she would have even a single minimally competent defense attorney.
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7023 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 1:14 am to
Make me prosecutor with subpoena power and I would be able to convict either Hillary or Trump of multiple felonies. But, in the USA, felons rule.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25999 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

Without getting into the merits of it, she still got cleared twice by the FBI. That's more than enough to establish "reasonable doubt" assuming she would have even a single minimally competent defense attorney.


I'm pretty sure that the FBI said that she did it. They never cleared her.

They said that they couldn't prosecute to get a conviction.
That would be like the LA district attorney saying that they know OJ killed Nicole but that they know that they can't get a conviction against his resources and the remnants of evidence. In case you are wondering, the FBI doesn't prosecute you with the hope that they get a conviction. All of the back room dealings were bringing to light how bad a prosecution resulting in a not guilty verdict would be. The FBI saved face by not prosecuting.
Posted by WhopperDawg
Member since Aug 2013
3073 posts
Posted on 11/25/16 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Without getting into the merits of it, she still got cleared twice by the FBI. That's more than enough to establish "reasonable doubt" assuming she would have even a single minimally competent defense attorney.


This really is quite simple - the FBI director works for the AG, the AG works for obama.

No way was she going to be indicted regardless of the evidence of which there is plenty. It would be easy to indict her on several crimes.

The real problem Trump faces is the precedent that would be set by one party indicting a former high ranking member of the opposing party. Maybe A special prosecutor goes after Trump after his time in office - he does want that. I think that is the rub.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter