Started By
Message

re: QBs down to two.

Posted on 8/29/16 at 12:34 am to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61898 posts
Posted on 8/29/16 at 12:34 am to
I'm right there with you. It reminds me of something that I read in high school:

quote:

If risk-taking were guaranteed, they'd call it 'sure-thing-taking'.


ETA - I can't find the source quote for that, so maybe I made it up. If so, then I'll claim it as my own.
This post was edited on 8/29/16 at 1:13 am
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12423 posts
Posted on 8/29/16 at 6:55 am to
Y'all, stop breathing out of your mouth for a second. This isn't a risk vs conservative argument. It's about making intelligent decisions about the long term development of our young QB who is by all accounts a phenom. There is a reason this has always been done. I realize that y'all know a lot more than anyone else who has ever been involved with football, but again.... Whatever... If he is ready, great... If he isn't and another QB plays, it is because our coaches are being wise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter