Started By
Message
re: QBs down to two.
Posted on 8/29/16 at 12:34 am to WhopperDawg
Posted on 8/29/16 at 12:34 am to WhopperDawg
I'm right there with you. It reminds me of something that I read in high school:
ETA - I can't find the source quote for that, so maybe I made it up. If so, then I'll claim it as my own.
quote:
If risk-taking were guaranteed, they'd call it 'sure-thing-taking'.
ETA - I can't find the source quote for that, so maybe I made it up. If so, then I'll claim it as my own.
This post was edited on 8/29/16 at 1:13 am
Posted on 8/29/16 at 6:55 am to VoxDawg
Y'all, stop breathing out of your mouth for a second. This isn't a risk vs conservative argument. It's about making intelligent decisions about the long term development of our young QB who is by all accounts a phenom. There is a reason this has always been done. I realize that y'all know a lot more than anyone else who has ever been involved with football, but again.... Whatever... If he is ready, great... If he isn't and another QB plays, it is because our coaches are being wise.
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News