Started By
Message
re: Tuscaloosa News editorial:"DA reasoning sows distrust in the system"
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:26 am to thelawnwranglers
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:26 am to thelawnwranglers
It was less than a gram of weed. Big fricking deal.
The gun was stolen? They clearly discovered that Cam wasn't the one who stole it.
So where is the preferential treatment? Even if you believe that they should have gotten charged for the weed, I couldn't give a frick less, because Marijuana laws are absolutely idiotic. I look at it as a win for the fact of drug laws being fricking stupid.
The gun was stolen? They clearly discovered that Cam wasn't the one who stole it.
So where is the preferential treatment? Even if you believe that they should have gotten charged for the weed, I couldn't give a frick less, because Marijuana laws are absolutely idiotic. I look at it as a win for the fact of drug laws being fricking stupid.
2
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:27 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
So where is the preferential treatment? Even if you believe that they should have gotten charged for the weed, I couldn't give a frick less, because Marijuana laws are absolutely idiotic. I look at it as a win for the fact of drug laws being fricking stupid.
The DA made a dumb quote so that clouds the fact that they clearly couldn't make a case
Posted on 6/21/16 at 10:00 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
The gun was stolen? They clearly discovered that Cam wasn't the one who stole it.
In all seriousness, do u have the link to that. I thought I saw somewhere that they just couldn't prove it was Cam's gun.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News