re: (takes off SEC goggles for two seconds) Satellite Camps, what's the big deal???

quote:

---

No way. When the system fails it will fail because of the huge stadiums and huge TV deals. That is what the judges will focus on. The NCAA is in freakout mode because the writing's on the wall and the emperor has no clothes. Hence their "unfair" decisions.

---

Agreed.

So back to square one, if that's true and what really will make the difference why then is THIS rule (which admittedly heavily favors one part over another) justifiable? There's no definitive proof of what the actual value it would bring to top schools, that remains to be seen.

It really just hurts the B list players vying for big time offers who might be overlooked locally, who also might not be able to afford unofficial visits or ever be rewarded officials to the schools they're targeting.

It also hurts the B list teams who send coaches to top flight school camps to recruit the guys that can't play at the LSUs & Bamas of the world. Thats where many of them find their guys, but no they're forbidden to go to those places. So this "hurt the little guy" argument is nonsense too.