Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Washington DC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7112
Registered on:3/29/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
He was trying to run interference for Rs. Trying to avoid Dems forcing them to vote on the record, which is the point, and exactly what Dems should and will do.

But that doesn't stop the mouth breathers all over this board from saying, "SeE, DeMS BloCKeD thE VOte!"
I bet that hits like crack if you don’t understand anything…

Burchett tried to call for unanimous consent, which keeps the votes anonymous so that the people couldn't see who voted against releasing. Democrats aren't willing to concede that and they shouldn't.
Too bad it’s from a wildly unserious person.

After the political theatre yesterday from Burchett, why should this move the needle for anyone?

Does he have any actual hard evidence to show us?
No no, they are actually idiots.

And they actively want to be treated as such, which is the craziest part.

This thread illustrates that point perfectly.
Yes, because if we learned anything from bindergate it’s that Trump/MAGA cares deeply for the victims :lol:

It’s always funny when you selectively don’t understand anything about the real world :lol:

I’ll keep that in mind next time you get excited Trump does something strictly to own the libs.
Rs would’ve been massively let off the hook for not having to go on record voting. Dems are getting the files either way, they’re absolutely gonna make Rs pay for it first.

And let’s be honest, Don asked for it w this stunt…

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

This thread is wild.

Take the Burchett vote yesterday, it’s one thing to be tricked/mislead at first, it happens.

“DeMS BloCKeD it” makes for a great Twitter grift, I get it. Insert siren emoji blah blah blah.

But you got posters here quadrupling down on total jibberish despite being shown in black and white what actually happened. Just yelling into the void anyway.

How did we get here!?!
You keep going back to that as if it refutes Burchetts intent, despite knowing that it doesn’t.

MAGAs perpetually gaslighting themselves is so bizarre.
You can say that about Obama if you want, but the fact that you have no idea what Burchett did yesterday calls into question any assumption about you actually understanding anything.

And you’re tripling down on it. Yikes.
He has no idea what happened yesterday.

Which is nuts because there’s not a single person in that room that was confused about it, nor is it a secret.
Hes talking about the Burchett vote.

You have to forgive posters like bond, he easily falls for tricks and doesn’t understand how anything works. He thinks Obama is going down for treason…. :lol:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Reeks of desperation.

When it comes to Epstein, Trump lost any upper hand he ever had when this happened….

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Yes, she’s the problem!

Bondi is the one calling the shots! Not Trump! :lol:
Sorry, none of that is relevant, for reasons or something. :lol:
I’m sorry, can you not read the title of graphs? Is that what’s giving you so much trouble?

Do you not know the Fred is? Are you a 12yo?

I added all of them.

How’s that?
A point that nobody gives a shite about. We’re talking about the price ( & tariffs) surrounding coffee. The mere existence of a very tiny coffee producer on a small island state isn’t relevant in that context.

Hell, what do you think the cost of shipping that much hypothetical Hawaiian coffee to the other 49 would do to the price??

DEEPLY unserious :lol: