Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Washington DC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:8390
Registered on:3/29/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
That’s not the misleading part!

Man, you’re really having a tough time beating the charges…
Read the thread title again.

If you don’t think that’s misleading, congrats, you’re easily mislead.
He saw a tweet that had the word “BREAKING” in it and just blindly assumed it was a big deal.

Happens all the time around here, honestly.
Trump has nothing to lose and doesn’t care how bad things get for Rs in 2028 (or beyond).

No reason to think he’s going to start acting rational now.
What you said about average jobs net gain (I’m assuming that 86k stat includes revisions, you tell me) doesn’t conflict with what I said at all! I even said this job report is a great one.

-He said, it’ll get revised down.
-You said, here’s one month when it didn’t.
-I said, here’s the 22month average of said revisions (which is down).

If your intellectual depth is only anecdotes, I don’t know what to tell you man.

The average monthly job revision over the last 22 months is -40k ish.

This is legitimately a great jobs report, but pointing to one positive revision which directly conflicts w the overwhelming trend is ridiculous.
Awful take.

He's proven he can be an outstanding DC multiple times (Utah St, Wisconsin, and LSU).

Have a downvote.
Trump will fire Hegseth before he faces impreachment, which is actually doing Pete a favor. Might be enough to get him off everyones radar....
quote:


Starting to see the election fraud posts creep up today. What stage of grief is this??


Loser cope around here is a feature, not a bug.

re: Will they go after Trump?

Posted by mwade91383 on 11/6/26 at 7:49 am to
Would be a mistake for Dems, he's the poster child for their recent victories.

As long as he's around, Reps will continue to lose. 2028 will be here before we know it and Dems would be smart to keep Trump in the front of everyone's mind.
Which is crazy because

1) he’s still POTUS
2) he’ll take 100% of the credit when it inevitably fully rebounds (which of course Dems get no credit for)

The man has never accepted any responsibility for anything that’s gone wrong ever. Why would he start now???
Aranda with a highly competent HC (and especially with a complimentary offense) can be every bit as good as Muschamp.

Both have coached here and done well, I don’t see one being significantly better than the other as a DC.
This is terrible myopic partisan financial advice that absolutely nobody should take seriously.

Bookmark this, please.

re: How are the Republicans surprised

Posted by mwade91383 on 11/5/26 at 11:28 am to
I jsut cannot believe people voted for socialism instead of $5,000 checks from the government....
quote:


Honestly considering the stakes and the team we were up against you could make an argument that was the greatest defensive performance in LSU history considering the offense just had no shot that night


I don't hate that take at all, although there are certainly some other very worthy perfomances in that era...

2011 Bama, 15 years ago today!
2014 Ole Miss

..I know I'm leaving out many others.

re: 2016 Bama/Kiffin vs LSU/Aranda

Posted by mwade91383 on 11/5/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

And the refs gifted bama a late TD when they missed two of the most blatant holds ever.


Holy smokes I forgot about that no call. Absurd.

Almost as bad as the PP7 INT that was overturned.....

2016 Bama/Kiffin vs LSU/Aranda

Posted by mwade91383 on 11/5/26 at 10:50 am
In 2016 LSU lost 10-0 in what would be absolute clinic by Aranda holding them to 10 points with absolutley no help from the offense.

Kiffin knows first hand how good of a defensive mind he is. If Baker takes an HC gig, I'd be thrilled to get him back....

ESPN BOX SCORE 10-0 LSU BAMA 2016
Could very well be our version of Muschamp...

-Outstanding coordinator
-Below average HC
-Goes back to being outstanding coordinator

Agreed and I kinda think they will, even wo Toney.

I have not been impressed with the ND games I've watched. I sprinkled a little on the Miami moneyline after the line moved post injury.
quote:

I did. Yesterday. The same question was ignored.


Probably a reason for that, it's a pretty unserious question after all....
Given the carnage all over the year (and still coming) I think the chances of us getting in at 9-3 are pretty good. Assuming not a blowout loss.

I think I saw some projections in the 50-60% range w 9-3.

We're 99.99% at 10-2 obviously