Can I call on my SEC brethren to do all you can tomorrow to stop Trump

The poli board is downstairs

The republican party is in shambles. Get ready for 8 years of this

Meh, I want to see TT9 cry.


Whomever he is voting for, I'm voting against.

quote:

---

I'm voting for Rubio, but heck, Cruz might make more sense in your respective state. Kasich and Carson are wasted votes that implicitly boost Trump.

It's up to the South to start the process of stopping this moron.

---

I'll be voting for Rubio, but there's no stopping Trump or Clinton now. Barring some outside event (like an indictment for Clinton), they're done deals.

And HRC is by no means a lock to beat Trump in the general election. He's tapped into something that's really resonating.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

As a man who enjoys it when the pussies in our country throw a hissy fit, I have no choice but to vote for Trump and Clinton.

quote:

---

Don't kid yourself. Trump will self-destruct in a head to head debate.

---

While I firmly and completely disagree with literally everything she stands for, there's no doubt that HRC would be vastly superior in terms knowledge on pretty much every single policy issue. She's been operating at the very highest level of government for almost 25 years now.

At this point, Trump could come out wearing an "I <3 Adolph" and I don't know that it would matter. Rubio, Cruz, Bush, and even Kaisch are all vastly superior on the issues and it hasn't mattered one whit.

Going a step further, it isn't like Clinton doesn't have a treasure trove of vulnerabilities in her own closet. Multiple polls have found voters find her LESS trustworthy that Trump.

Finally, the biggest problem with the idea that debates would matter is the fact that too many voters now find that twitter requires too much attention. They aren't going to get into the weeds of the detail, it will be all about the sound bite and that's one place the Donald will have a legitimate advantage.

It has been an amazing thing to watch the way the election's unfolded. Drudge linked to a story in the NY Post today that says there are polls that suggest a Trump v Clinton matchup would legitimately put New York State into play. I'll have to see that to believe it, but the fact that it is even being suggested shows just how the dynamic has changed this election cycle. I posted last summer that Trump would be out before March and I couldn't have been more wrong. People will be studying his campaign for years to come.

quote:

---

Bill back in the WH, Bill back in the WH & Bill back in the WH

---

As a staunch conservative, I find it hard to type this but the fact is that Bill's presidency really wasn't that bad after the (D)s got smacked around in the 1994 midterms. He and Newt sat down and got work done. They passed the DOMA, enacted real welfare reform, cut legal immigration, actually had a balanced budget, and the economy was quite good.

The problem is, despite their massive effort to convince the public otherwise, Bill Clinton circa 1996 isn't on the ballot and the voters know it.

What was Bill getting early on? Was she hotter or less shrill?

quote:

---

---

quote:

---

Was she hotter or less shrill?

---

hotter? no

less shrill? she had to be...