Started By
Message
re: Why is Peyton Manning getting a free pass?
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:10 pm to Tennessee Jed
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:10 pm to Tennessee Jed
If every player in the NFL is on PEDs as you postulate, then why are people defending Mannin(h)g(h) and insisting he is clean, including people in this thread? Either everyone including Mannin(h)g(h) is taking PEDs or not everyone takes PEDs and your assertion is false. Which is it?
0
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:12 pm to SmokeTide
Because he is nicer than Brady?
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:12 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
The report would have been treated differently if it were broken by Sports Illustrated instead of Al Jazeera.
This is true. Especially after US intelligence released that video of Jihadi John saying, "[w]e must take out America's Peyton Manning. If America loses confidence in its Peyton Manning, the country shall crumble."
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:12 pm to SmokeTide
"but fact that he did receive shipments of HGH to his home that has been proven"
Not to say that you are wrong, but I've never seen where this has been proven. Do you have a source for this?
I would find it highly unlikely that it would be proven since HIPAA would not allow such a thing to go out without the Manning's permission.
Not to say that you are wrong, but I've never seen where this has been proven. Do you have a source for this?
I would find it highly unlikely that it would be proven since HIPAA would not allow such a thing to go out without the Manning's permission.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:15 pm to Ingloriousbastard
I thought this was going to be about Manning sticking his arse in that trainers face. #disappointed
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:16 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:No
Every single player in the NFL is on some type of PED. Believe that.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:17 pm to Glorious
quote:
Preponderance of evidence baw
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:20 pm to SmokeTide
Thought this thread was gonna be about him shoving his dick n balls in a UT-K trainer's face ...
Nevermind.
Nevermind.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:20 pm to StopRobot
It blows my mind how many arguments or topics are brought up with premises that aren't actual facts on the internet. It hurts my head. 
Seriously, I really want to know how it is a proven fact that his wife received this? Without knowing that this thread is basically worthless.
Seriously, I really want to know how it is a proven fact that his wife received this? Without knowing that this thread is basically worthless.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:21 pm to SmokeTide
cause it was outted by a bunch of hadji's
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:54 pm to SmokeTide
This isn't baseball. Nobody really cares about this stuff in football
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:55 pm to rockytop627
quote:
Peyton did nothing
Yea...OK
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:58 pm to SmokeTide
I don't remember this part:
quote:
he did receive shipments of HGH to his home that has been proven.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:07 pm to dboyback
Couple things:
1.Story was recanted.
2.There is no actual proof that HGH was received by him or his wife.
And let's say, hypothetically, that the story hadn't been recanted, and that his wife did receive a package with HGH, few things:
1. He's never tested positive for it. So there's no proof that he took it.
2. It wasn't a banned substance at the time he would have supposedly taken it.
3. Even if it was a banned substance, and he tested positive for it at the time he supposedly took it, he didn't play that year due to injury, so he wouldn't have been in violation of the NFL substance abuse policy.
This is the biggest NON-STORY, EVER
1.Story was recanted.
2.There is no actual proof that HGH was received by him or his wife.
And let's say, hypothetically, that the story hadn't been recanted, and that his wife did receive a package with HGH, few things:
1. He's never tested positive for it. So there's no proof that he took it.
2. It wasn't a banned substance at the time he would have supposedly taken it.
3. Even if it was a banned substance, and he tested positive for it at the time he supposedly took it, he didn't play that year due to injury, so he wouldn't have been in violation of the NFL substance abuse policy.
This is the biggest NON-STORY, EVER
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:16 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
1. He's never tested positive for it. So there's no proof that he took it.
The NFL didn't test for hgh until 2014. Of course he didn't fail a test for using hgh in 2013 or before.
HGH was a banned substance in the NFL in 1991. Might want to get your facts together on that. This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:20 pm to therick711
quote:
The NFL didn't test for hgh until 2015. Of course he didn't fail a test for using hgh in 2013.
Exactly my point, so what is the issue? Care to respond to any of the other 5 points that I made? Or do you think you "Got me?
Nice edit, but it doesn't change any of the other 5 points, sorry
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:22 pm to Vols&Shaft83
I responded to the two most crucial points. He didn't fail a test because his union wouldn't allow the league to test him. Also, it was banned since 1991. Not sure more needs to be said. The forehead says it all.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:27 pm to therick711
quote:
The forehead says it all.
You do realize he has always had a big forehead correct? Dude just has a big head. Barry Bonds head actually grew but Manning just has a big head naturally. The only difference is the hairline.
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:28 pm to therick711
quote:
responded to the two most crucial points
No you didn't
Posted on 1/28/16 at 2:30 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Yes, I did. In fact you said three things that are absolutely wrong. I didn't bother to correct you on the idea that his hgh use in 2011 didn't violate league rules.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News