Started By
Message

re: Realignment? The talks are starting again

Posted on 1/15/16 at 6:46 pm to
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 1/15/16 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

#149 Oklahoma State is that bad. (And that ranking reinforces my belief that US News is clueless, with them above the rantards at Texas Tech and, sadly, MSU) And as long as T. Boone Pickens is alive, Oklahoma isn't going anywhere without Oklahoma State.

Even the derpiest birds have to be thrown from the nest eventually. OSU will either fly or land on the crown of its head, breaking its spine.

Either way, nothing of value would be lost.

quote:

Disclaimer: Aggies would HATE OU coming to the SEC. Those bastards have been stealing Texas recruits for decades and that has only recently started making moves in the right direction. Bringing them to the SEC moves them back to their good old days. Adrian Peterson, Billy Sims, etc.

But my scenario cuts Texas out of the picture, because they'd be floundering much like they have been ever since Colt McCoy got his hymen torn in the NCG.
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 6:50 pm
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 1/15/16 at 6:54 pm to
I'm all for Texas floundering, but I think they're doing a fine job of that on their own without you trying to break up the OU/OSU marriage.

Back to the original question, why do we want to add anybody? Is it really inevitable? I actually sympathize with others here who wish the SEC was still 12 and you got to play everybody more often than once a decade.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter