Started By
Message

re: #21 Texas A&M 61 vs Mississippi State 60 | Final

Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50956 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:46 pm to
WE SHOT 30.6 % AND WON.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14176 posts
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:49 pm to
Rick Ray inadvertently almost put our basketball program six feet under.
Posted by MadisonDawg3
Member since May 2014
6 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 3:55 am to
Gavin bailed him out by getting the rebound/fouled and making his two free throws.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
9469 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 5:50 am to
What does two missed FT's by Newman have anything to do with the reckless abandon of Sword which was my point?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32514 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 6:28 am to
quote:

What does two missed FT's by Newman have anything to do with the reckless abandon of Sword which was my point?
I don't much basketball until later in the year but no one play or two plays lost that game. The flat footed rebounding (or lack of) was the difference in that game. On our end, we get one chance because we can't rebound. On their end, they get two and three because we can't rebound. And, they aren't that good of a rebounding team.
Posted by agrunner
Flower Mound
Member since Dec 2012
4617 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 6:57 am to
quote:

And, they aren't that good of a rebounding tea


Were ranked 66 in rebounding at 39.4 rpg.

Your team is ranked 277 in rebounding at 34.7 rpg.

I guess making shite up makes you feel good about your team.
Posted by ChargerDog91
Member since May 2012
4394 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 7:19 am to
quote:

66


That's not a good rebounding team. I mean it's fair. I'll give you that.
Posted by agrunner
Flower Mound
Member since Dec 2012
4617 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 7:26 am to
Your post implies that your team should be rebounding much better than ours than it did. I disagree, there's no evidence that your team underperformed against us in rebounds. St. is terrible at rebounding and hit their average(you had 34 rebounds last night).
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32514 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:03 am to
quote:


Were ranked 66 in rebounding at 39.4 rpg.

Your team is ranked 277 in rebounding at 34.7 rpg.

I guess making shite up makes you feel good about your team.


66 is not good. 277 is horrible. But, 3 more offensive rebounds could have won a 1 point game; a game that probably shouldn't have been close. That was my point.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50956 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:43 am to
quote:

66 is not good. 277 is horrible. But, 3 more offensive rebounds could have won a 1 point game; a game that probably shouldn't have been close. That was my point.


A 1 point game because A&M gave you the 3.
Posted by ChargerDog91
Member since May 2012
4394 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:00 am to
Where in anything did I imply that we have a much better rebounding anything? Do you even reading comprehension bro?
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter