Started By
Message
re: Clay Travis Reports Fact Via Twitter- CONFIRMED
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:15 pm to Sleepy Magma
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:15 pm to Sleepy Magma
quote:
Sleepy Magma
Not obvious enough, imo
0
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:15 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Sadly, not true:
LINK
Media matters. You know, when you get your information from such highly biased sources, you'll end up with a very jaded world view such as yours.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:15 pm to Vols&Shaft83
I provided a link. Head in the sand?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Cross-reference the story. Fox News did in fact try to attribute the motive away from race. This was widely reported on...Not my fault if you are in denial...
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:17 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Cross-reference the story. Fox News did in fact try to attribute the motive away from race. This was widely reported on...Not my fault if you are in denial...
I'm not the one reading a shite site like Media Matters to feed an extremist perspective.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:20 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Cross-reference the story. Fox News did in fact try to attribute the motive away from race. This was widely reported on...Not my fault if you are in denial...
I'm not reading media matters, nor am I watching Fox News. After the facts of the case came out, ie: Witness testimony, Shooter's identity and affiliations, was ANYBODY saying it wasn't about race?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:24 pm to Tigerdev
Huffington post, the Slate, and Washington comPost?
Come on son
Come on son
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:24 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
LINK /
Oops. You've been pwnd.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I've never discussed the Charleston Shooting. We're discussing the fake outrage at MU.
You get your warped sense of values from sites like Media Matters, which explains your attempts to deflect in this thread.
Female, 250 lbs, 21 years old. How close am I?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:25 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Oh I see. Well why don't you tell me what hallowed source we are allowed to reference. How about this? Watch the Fox and Friends cast yourself these articles reference and dispute their findings...
But you won't...So lets just agree to disagree.
Happy Vets day.
But you won't...So lets just agree to disagree.
Happy Vets day.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:28 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I'm not reading media matters, nor am I watching Fox News. After the facts of the case came out, ie: Witness testimony, Shooter's identity and affiliations, was ANYBODY saying it wasn't about race?
Correct. They're playing games with the timeline and suggesting Fox should've known it was about race because it was a black church.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Female, 250 lbs, 21 years old. How close am I?
I think your high on the weight side and low on the age. I'm going with 230 and 27.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:31 pm to the808bass
With 3 cats
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:34 pm to the808bass
Ha, I can tell when I am winning an argument when the opposition gives up on making actual points and starts attacking me personally. 
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:36 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Ha, I can tell when I am winning an argument when the opposition gives up on making actual points and starts attacking me personally.
I wouldnt say you are close to winning. Fox news did do as you said and linked, they also did attribute it to racism in other commentaries and articles as well. Its easy to prove your point when you leave out facts that disprove it as well
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:41 pm to NYCAuburn
I am not writing a thesis here. I was responding to a post which claimed no one disputed the Charleston shooting's racial context. My only responsibility was to refute that statement which I did.
Next?
Next?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:41 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Ha, I can tell when I am winning an argument when the opposition gives up on making actual points and starts attacking me personally.
So when you started your argument in the thread with an implication that posters were racist, you were saying you had lost the argument as you were engaging in ad hominem yourself.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:44 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
I am not writing a thesis here. I was responding to a post which claimed no one disputed the Charleston shooting's racial context. My only responsibility was to refute that statement which I did.
Next?
After the facts came out? No, you didn’t refute that statement. Next?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:44 pm to the808bass
That's a stretch.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 3:46 pm to Vols&Shaft83
You have moved the goal posts several times here pal.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News