Started By
Message
re: Coaching search: Who do we look for?
Posted on 9/22/15 at 7:00 am to Cockopotamus
Posted on 9/22/15 at 7:00 am to Cockopotamus
Dude are you seriously melting so hard that you have to start a thread on the main board about it?
I said I would have no problem discussing it in person but did not want to discus it on a public board. Instead of accepting this and moving on you go full retard.
You have a hard on for Strong by your posts in this thread and my posts on him may have thrown some sand in your oyster but it could be I know way more about Strong / Louisville than I am willing to post here. This could be due to the serious nature of the internet or it could be I am just old fashioned and don't reveal what I actually know because that is what old people do.
I know in the age of Twit(ter) this may seem strange and foreign to you but there was a time when folks respected privacy a bit more than they do now. If you are that wound up about this just spend less time here and more time here
ps, posting on a thread by its very nature means that person is not a lurker.
lurk·er
'l?rk?r/
noun
a person who lurks, in particular a user of an Internet message board or chat room who does not participate.
I said I would have no problem discussing it in person but did not want to discus it on a public board. Instead of accepting this and moving on you go full retard.
You have a hard on for Strong by your posts in this thread and my posts on him may have thrown some sand in your oyster but it could be I know way more about Strong / Louisville than I am willing to post here. This could be due to the serious nature of the internet or it could be I am just old fashioned and don't reveal what I actually know because that is what old people do.
I know in the age of Twit(ter) this may seem strange and foreign to you but there was a time when folks respected privacy a bit more than they do now. If you are that wound up about this just spend less time here and more time here
ps, posting on a thread by its very nature means that person is not a lurker.
lurk·er
'l?rk?r/
noun
a person who lurks, in particular a user of an Internet message board or chat room who does not participate.
2
Posted on 9/22/15 at 11:51 am to Cheese Grits
This will probably draw laughs (as it probably should after some message board poster "confirmed" Muschamp to USC with similar info) but I've been told Jon Gruden is currently looking at properties on Lake Murray, and I'd say it's about 90-95% reliable considering who it is coming from.
But even if this is 100% accurate,
1) It could be totally unrelated - anyone know if he has any family/personal ties to SC and Columbia?
2) I'd still think if he was going to leave the MNF gig for coaching it would be for the NFL and he would have done it already.
I don't post here much and wouldn't waste my time just to stir up more bs. Just thought it was interesting and worth mentioning while we're putting our "dream hires" out there.
Cheese, definitely understand the privacy thing. Is the opportunity to pick your brain on this only reserved for longtime posters?
But even if this is 100% accurate,
1) It could be totally unrelated - anyone know if he has any family/personal ties to SC and Columbia?
2) I'd still think if he was going to leave the MNF gig for coaching it would be for the NFL and he would have done it already.
I don't post here much and wouldn't waste my time just to stir up more bs. Just thought it was interesting and worth mentioning while we're putting our "dream hires" out there.
Cheese, definitely understand the privacy thing. Is the opportunity to pick your brain on this only reserved for longtime posters?
Posted on 9/22/15 at 1:42 pm to Cheese Grits
So this has to do with privacy now?
Just stop trying to make excuses. You tried to look cool by saying you knew who was being targeted but didn't give a name, I called you on your bullshite and you've made yourself look like a damn fool trying to justify not posting a name.
And if you read this thread you would know that your comments about Strong didn't affect me and I'm on board the Shane Beamer pain train
Just stop trying to make excuses. You tried to look cool by saying you knew who was being targeted but didn't give a name, I called you on your bullshite and you've made yourself look like a damn fool trying to justify not posting a name.
And if you read this thread you would know that your comments about Strong didn't affect me and I'm on board the Shane Beamer pain train
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News