Started By
Message
re: LOL at the Shag
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:52 am to PowerTool
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:52 am to PowerTool
This isn't much different in principle from what happens on Texags. Just yesterday they deleted a bunch of pictures of the interior of the stadium because the AD told them to. They censor a lot of words and whack threads criticizing players and especially coaches with the swiftness.
The difference is that Texags does this to preserve incredible inside access which makes for uniquely good content. Shaggy is just a it version of tRant and Patterson bitch slapped them.
The difference is that Texags does this to preserve incredible inside access which makes for uniquely good content. Shaggy is just a it version of tRant and Patterson bitch slapped them.
3
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:57 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Unfortunately it would have cost $100k+ to defend.
I'm shocked that one of their 1,000's of big cigar members hasn't offered to pay the legal fees with the change in the cracks of his couch
Shocked I tell ya
Posted on 8/2/15 at 8:59 am to Roger Klarvin
Oh, and general A did catch a ban this morning but it's not permanent.....yet
I don't see how an admin could reason that that account should exist.
I don't see how an admin could reason that that account should exist.
Posted on 8/2/15 at 9:19 am to Roger Klarvin
TexAgs is too close to the school, IMO.
They do have the access, but they are at the heel of the AD/Admin and often will sit on good info at the request of their benefactors.
It's a delicate balancing act, and they do what is good for them, but they aren't as independent as I'd like them to be.
They do have the access, but they are at the heel of the AD/Admin and often will sit on good info at the request of their benefactors.
It's a delicate balancing act, and they do what is good for them, but they aren't as independent as I'd like them to be.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News