Started By
Message
re: BIG 12 expanding again?
Posted on 6/24/15 at 5:43 pm to Robert Goulet
Posted on 6/24/15 at 5:43 pm to Robert Goulet
quote:
In that case, thank you for being an auto-win for the Big 6 en route to numerous championships.
I didn't say we were an auto-win. We do our part!
For example, the Stoernover in '98 so Tennessee can win it all. If Stoerner hadn't fumbled while kneeling to run out the clock, then Arkansas would have beat #1 Tennessee in Knoxville and ended the Vols hope of winning the first BCS title.
Your welcome!
Posted on 6/24/15 at 5:50 pm to redeye
quote:
I didn't say we were an auto-win. We do our part!
For example, the Stoernover in '98 so Tennessee can win it all. If Stoerner hadn't fumbled while kneeling to run out the clock, then Arkansas would have beat #1 Tennessee in Knoxville and ended the Vols hope of winning the first BCS title.
Your welcome!
Except there would've been a rematch in the SECCG, with the winner going on to play FSU.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 7:38 am to redeye
quote:
I didn't say we were an auto-win. We do our part!
For example, the Stoernover in '98 so Tennessee can win it all. If Stoerner hadn't fumbled while kneeling to run out the clock, then Arkansas would have beat #1 Tennessee in Knoxville and ended the Vols hope of winning the first BCS title.
Your welcome!
Actually, there was a bad call prior to that play. A possession earlier, the Arkansas punter (Akin) kicked a bad snap backwards through the endzone behind him for a safety. At that time, the proper call would have been to give UT the ball at the spot that it was kicked...so, instead of being down 22-24...UT would have been down 24-20 with the ball on the Arkansas 20 yard line (with just under 3 minutes in regulation). If the punter was in the endzone when he kicked it, it would have been a touchback. Because he was in the field of play, it was supposed to be a loss of down penalty.
A bad call is what led to the Stoerner fumble even being relevant.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News