Started By
Message

re: UGA pulls a UC-Berkley

Posted on 3/23/15 at 11:29 am to
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 3/23/15 at 11:29 am to
Academia professors across this country have become pawns for Progressivism/Collectivism.

Unfortunately, academia is filled with pragmatists who believe in concrete practical metaphysics, and this mindset 1000% clashes with the concept of "faith", or more precisely, the religious right, and therefore much of the basis of ideology for a huge portion of Conservatives (which is a whole nother sad issue in itself).

And slowly over time, theories, ideas, and beliefs that can be substantiated by science and math and hard evidence have pushed out those that have a foundational belief system that utilizes faith in a very big way.

It has nothing to do with intellectualism or Liberals claiming to be the "smarter" party. It's simply been a slow evolution of advances in technology helping practical people win arguments over faith-based people.

And as the history of the two-party system has evolved, this culture of Academics have aligned more closely with Liberal/Progressive ideologies as a result. And as this has happened, so has the formative attempted indoctrination, brainwashing, and propagating of critical Liberal talking points, like racism, white guilt, and political correctness.

Proving theories, creating facts, and advancing technologies and way of life processes essentially began in the 50's, then gradually grew steadily through the 60's and 70's, but then began an exponential renaissance during the 80's, and then absolutely exploded straight up starting in the 90's.

And unfortunately, this created an entire generation of people indoctrinated into this new version of Liberalism. Everyone teaching them was going, "See, advances have afforded us proof of everything we say. They're wrong, we're right." And who wants to be on the side that the teachers all say are wrong?

And that generation is now who leads this country. Not the people who believe in Faith. Not the people who had to work because they couldn't afford school. Not the people who grew up without family money. But by people who's belief systems were molded by Academics who were drunk on the power of bending adolescent minds to their will.

And today's richest and most wealthy people are members of that generation who grew up in that environment. And through their wealth, they have learned the power of Collectivism, and utilizing this two-party system and division of ideologies across our populace to their advantage.

Political correctness on college campuses is nothing more than an extension of this long-evolving trend that's taken over academia. The Collectivists have completely imbedded party-line ideological division mechanics in every facet of our lives.
This post was edited on 3/23/15 at 11:52 am
Posted by nuwaydawg
Member since Nov 2007
1933 posts
Posted on 3/23/15 at 6:40 pm to
Liberals react emotionally. Slippery slope.

Would this vice president react similarly to a person that has their pants around their thighs, underwear showing?

Would he argue that this is an expression of minority repression, penal system indoctrination of the solidarity blacks have because of prisoners?

Hoop skirts/showing your underwear.

I don't give a frick.

When you take it upon yourself to ban anything that is protected by the Constitution, I do.

Who elected this vice president to enact...bans.

What right do you have to tell anybody how they should portray themselves? What should they do in order to not "Offend" someone else? What is your guideline *cough* *cough* rule/empowerment?

I only went to north campus because I had to for the "Classical Education". I can say that the ideas presented opened my eyes, presented ideas that "inquired into the nature of things", not the ban of things.
Posted by PDXDawg
Member since Aug 2013
753 posts
Posted on 3/24/15 at 2:41 pm to
Beef dawg , just so I'm clear, your assertion is that liberals gained an upper-hand through education and fact-based science, "winning arguments" as you say, over faith-based, less-pragmatic conservatives, and then took that political capital and "brainwashed" generations to come? Is it possible that pragmatic, fact-based arguments are the more appropriate "argument" to be had in politics? As opposed to ones of faith?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter