Started By
Message

re: ESPN SEC RB Units Rankings

Posted on 2/24/15 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by DC RaiseHerBack
Member since Nov 2006
55445 posts
Posted on 2/24/15 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

I'll take Fournette.


Well, they are ranking RB units. Not sole RBs.

And I like the fact that they are going by production and not potential.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44023 posts
Posted on 2/24/15 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

And I like the fact that they are going by production and not potential.


If this were actually true LSU wouldn't even be top 5. They are factoring potential in pretty heavily.
Posted by 33inNC
Charlotte, NC
Member since Mar 2011
4991 posts
Posted on 2/24/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Well, they are ranking RB units. Not sole RBs. And I like the fact that they are going by production and not potential.


If this is the case, explain Alabama's ranking. Their bellcow didn't even hit 1000 yds and their other returning RB is coming off a major leg injury. I have no issue with the other rankings, just this one.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36644 posts
Posted on 2/24/15 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Well, they are ranking RB units. Not sole RBs.


I was just replying to the stupid "blind RV stats" hypothetical.

quote:

If this were actually true LSU wouldn't even be top 5. They are factoring potential in pretty heavily.


I was under the impression this was a ranking for spring. Ducre is the only RB that enrolled for spring.

Not sure I'd have ranked LSU at this point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter