Started By
Message

re: Are we really underachieving vs. the rest of the SEC?

Posted on 2/6/15 at 7:51 pm to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45236 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

LSU, Bama, AU all get the majority of their in state top prospects. Ours go to UCLA, Ohio State, USC, Auburn and FL.


THIS. And if it was just because Atlanta is a transplant city, then Texas and Texas A&M would have a hard time recruiting Houston and Dallas because they're both transplant cities too. Other than the occasional Stafford or Adrian Peterson, those two teams get most of the big time players in Texas.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64527 posts
Posted on 2/6/15 at 8:03 pm to
LINK



quote:

THIS. And if it was just because Atlanta is a transplant city, then Texas and Texas A&M would have a hard time recruiting Houston and Dallas because they're both transplant cities too. Other than the occasional Stafford or Adrian Peterson, those two teams get most of the big time players in Texas.



13 of the top 25 in TX didn't sign with UT or AnM.

Just sayin'.


UGA got 8 of georgia's top 25.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 8:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter