Started By
Message

re: 2016 UGA Recruiting Thread (commits, offers, visits, etc.)

Posted on 6/1/15 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26177 posts
Posted on 6/1/15 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Eason is far and away better and its not even close.


He's definitely not. Patterson is an elite prospect, just like Eason. He's ranked higher than Eason in a few services so it's clearly close.

Also, "it's not even close" is the dumbest fricking phrase on the internet, especially when making an opinion on something. In this case it's borderline retarded because the two quarterbacks are definitely close in talent level. That's pretty clear, bias aside.

I'm also sure that neither fanbase would trade one for the other. Patterson really fits what Ole Miss likes to do because he can move in the pocket and throw well on the run. Eason is currently in a complex high school offense and is making more than one read most of the time which is exactly what we're looking for in a prospect.
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25681 posts
Posted on 6/1/15 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

He's definitely not. Patterson is an elite prospect, just like Eason. He's ranked higher than Eason in a few services so it's clearly close.






.
Posted by Kneehigh
Low Country
Member since Nov 2012
13331 posts
Posted on 6/1/15 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Also, "it's not even close" is the dumbest fricking phrase on the internet, especially when making an opinion on something. In this case it's borderline retarded because the two quarterbacks are definitely close in talent level. That's pretty clear, bias aside.

The film available doesn't lie. Eason CLEARLY, ABSOLUTELY, NO frickING DOUBT ABOUT IT, has the better arm strength. He makes throws in his film that some experienced college QB's struggle with. If you watch the Patterson kid, I can count multiple times where he under throws his WR targets. Eason also shows the ability to lead his receivers and has better accuracy when trying to throw in between 2 defenders compared to Patterson. Not saying the kid is a bad QB. He's a very good QB. He's no Eason.
quote:

Eason is currently in a complex high school offense and is making more than one read most of the time which is exactly what we're looking for in a prospect.

Ok... This by itself is another reason why Eason is a better prospect. Again, not saying Patterson is a bad prospect... But he's sure as hell not #1. Eason is much better IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter