Started By
Message

re: 18 years of fraud at Chapel Hill...

Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25901 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

SMU and the ramifications for the SWC are a terrible example to compare this to.

Without UNC, UVA, and Duke's desire for the ACC to stay together, the conference is incredibly unstable. Take out one of those and it becomes even more so.
Posted by Montezuma
Member since Apr 2013
3629 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Without UNC, UVA, and Duke's desire for the ACC to stay together, the conference is incredibly unstable. Take out one of those and it becomes even more so.


Conversely, think if they try to keep it. The money and influence of those schools could probably do some damage to a lot of big time schools, especially if they start going the "oh, you are going to punish us?" way. A lot of athletic departments are doing things that will result in NCAA infractions (though by no means would I say to the level of UNC). Putting pressure on the NCAA to be consistent could mean a lot of other consequences. And don't act like none of our schools do some shady stuff to keep our athletes eligible. Even Stanford does it, and got caught (with no punishment).

You start talking death penalty, watch a lot of things happen.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58174 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Without UNC, UVA, and Duke's desire for the ACC to stay together, the conference is incredibly unstable. Take out one of those and it becomes even more so.


UNC having a single year death penalty would NOT kill the ACC or those schools desire to stay.

Again, SMU is an incredibly poor example to use for various reasons.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter