Started By
Message

re: Coaching Changes Discussion - Chief locked up, what about rest?

Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:27 am to
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:27 am to
quote:

but the bidding failure last time we went shopping for a DC

money is not our issue in any way, shape or form. We lost on Narduzzi (and other coaches) in 2012 because we gave Sumlin a hard cap of $2.2m to build a coaching staff. The big money had not coalesced around a head coach and many didn't like the way Sherman was let go. They weren't inclined to blindly open their checkbooks to a guy they didn't know (Sumlin).

That's not the case today. And virtually every request Sumlin has made in the last 2 years has been granted without fuss. Unlimited use of helicopter? Check. New lockerrooms? Check. Pay bump to staff? Check. We've gone from an assistant pool in 2012 of 2.2m to 4.5m today (and potentially higher). Sumlin has their undivided support.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34357 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Sumlin has their undivided support.


Sure tmc95, I can see that. I wasn't really thinking that a lack of support is a problem, everyone I talked to loves the idea of Boom. If it came down to a million or two all it would take is one email and a hat passed around to cover the gap. I don't think we can be outbid.

With that said, I think we have what I call the "Texas Problem." Namely, that Texas's philosophy of "we can pay whoever we want whatever we want" isn't true at all because no matter your AD budget you are part of a community both in the sport and outside it. In the sport if you pay too much for a coach and really move that bar of salaries for everyone you can quickly become a villain. That is what happened to Texas somewhat IMHO. Outside the sport these coaches quickly become some of the highest paid public employees in the state, which invites criticism both inside academia and outside of it when you are blowing millions a year on a guy who isn't the head coach.

I think there is a ceiling of how much we would pay an assistant coach politically, and I think thanks to SEC Network money any SEC team could hit that same ceiling too if they wanted to. That means we have to stand out on intangibles, which works against us right now.

First choices aren't always best choices, and it should all work out. But if Boom takes the Auburn job over ours and that is pretty public that will really hurt fan confidence in Sumlin's regime.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter