Started By
Message

re: Gurley eligible to return for Auburn

Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:14 am to
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:14 am to
I am really shocked a bammer would drag Cam into this situation instead of the numerous players from their own school that have actually been proven to accept improper benefits
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19734 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I am really shocked a bammer would drag Cam into this situation instead of the numerous players from their own school that have actually been proven to accept improper benefits


Me too. Because they have never proven Cam took anything. So it's apples and oranges.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 8:15 am to
quote:

I am really shocked a bammer would drag Cam into this situation instead of the numerous players from their own school that have actually been proven to accept improper benefits



Drag Cam into it? You do realize Cam was "reinstated" just like this, right?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter