Started By
Message
re: Bookmark : Stanford, Iowa, Michigan, Michigan St, and Minnesota fear SEC venues?
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:57 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:57 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
What I'm getting at is why does it make sense to not count any of the wins that the PCC had over other conferences but its ok for the SWC to do so when the SWC was the PCC on steroids?
Again, even if the PCC gets to keep all the wins, should they accrue to pad the PAC stats?
Yes or No
If you disband a conference, should those trophies accrue to brand new conference?
Yes or No
Comparing PCC and SWC are not exactly the same. SWC broke up and the schools scattered to the wind. PCC broke up and all the bad apples reformed into the same basic conference.
PCC schools - Idaho = whitewashed AAWU
vs
SWC schools
Arkansas = SEC
Texas A&M = SEC via B12
Rice, SMU, and TCU = WAC
Houston = CUSA
Baylor, Texas, and Texas Tech = B12
Death penalty certainly killed SMU, but killing off the SWC and not allowing it to form again is a whole different outcome. If some of the smaller and / or private TX schools had been large public flagship universities there is no doubt they would have followed the PCC model and become SWC II with the same basic schools.
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:10 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:when the new conference is essentially the old conference just with a different name? I have no issue. And what I was getting at was that you were saying that wins in the PCC should not count at all because of the cheating going on. Well the same shite was going on at the SWC with every single school except what was going on there was what the PCC was doing on steroids. SMU wasn't the only school cheating, they were just idiotic about it
If you disband a conference, should those trophies accrue to brand new conference?
This post was edited on 10/15/14 at 9:12 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News