Started By
Message
re: LSU-Mizzou 2013: Who wins and why?
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:59 am to Pelican fan99
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:59 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
this. The common opponent argument is pretty weak
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest.
I dont know if LSU would beat Mizzou or not but the fricking cajun tinged nonsense that they would beat Mizzou by "2 scores" is just flat pathetic.
Thats the only thing I was really arguing.
4
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:10 am to kilo
It's a pretty weak argument no matter who it favors
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:11 am to kilo
If you think they're bad just wait for lil bro auburn
Posted on 8/2/14 at 8:27 am to kilo
quote:
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest. I dont know if LSU would beat Mizzou or not but the fricking cajun tinged nonsense that they would beat Mizzou by "2 scores" is just flat pathetic. Thats the only thing I was really arguing.
I don't know about pathetic. Our defense feasts on offenses like Mizzous. Do not look to Ole miss as an example. They are always an outlier with us and that game is always close regardless.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 4:15 pm to kilo
quote:
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest.
Common opponents/transitive property arguments are weak no matter who is on what side.
The UGA team that beat LSU was vastly different than the UGA team that Mizzou beat. Just like the Auburn team that LSU corn holed was different than the Auburn team that beat Mizzou.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News