He is not on Scout's commit list for 2013.

You are acting like that class was way overrated due to Brassell being counted twice. The dude was fricking gone before the Summer, before Treadwell and Tunsil and those guys reported.

2013 was a fricking baller class bottom line, with or without Brassell, who played for Nutt a whole season. Take Brassel out and that class still Top 10, something State could never pull off.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by NIH

Member since Aug 2008

112912 posts

Posted on 7/25/14 at 9:13 pm to GreyReb

I think we did in the early 2000s. Not that it mattered

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by engie

Member since Jan 2012

8953 posts

Posted on 7/25/14 at 10:03 pm to GreyReb

quote:
He is not on Scout's commit list for 2013.

If you use Scout as your primary basis for rankings -- you don't follow recruiting.

quote:
You are acting like that class was way overrated due to Brassell being counted twice. The dude was fricking gone before the Summer, before Treadwell and Tunsil and those guys reported.

I'm not acting like anything. Quit projecting bullshite. I simply pointed out a bunch of facts that you've tarded up and made into a much bigger deal than it was.

quote:
2013 was a fricking baller class bottom line, with or without Brassell, who played for Nutt a whole season. Take Brassel out and that class still Top 10, something State could never pull off.

If you are trying to take a fair representation of how good the class is, you don't just remove Brassell. You remove everyone that is now gone and never made major contributions. You are already at 257pts(good for #12) while still counting Hooks and Kailo, who neither have contributed yet, and I suspect Kailo never will.

4 or 5 elite players does not a truly elite recruiting class make.

This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 10:08 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by lsufball19