re: Let's be honest, LSU would have beaten Okie St in the 2011 Natty game.

Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:13 pm to Bootycall

Posted by Louie T

htx

Member since Dec 2006

36339 posts

Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:13 pm to Bootycall

Good thread, Larry

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy

Member since Sep 2011

81365 posts

Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:26 pm to Bootycall

Is this really up for debate?

Rushing Offense vs. Rushing Defense

LSU (22-203 ypg) vs. Oklahoma State (90-184.92 ypg)

Oklahoma State (58-159 ypg) vs. LSU (5-90 ypg)

Passing Offense vs. Pass Defense

LSU (106-153 ypg) vs. Oklahoma State (107-272 ypg)

Oklahoma State (2-387 ypg) vs. LSU (8-171 ypg)

Total Offense vs. Total Defense

LSU (86-355 ypg) vs. Oklahoma State (107-457 ypg)

Oklahoma State (3-546 ypg) vs. LSU (2-262 ypg)

Scoring Offense vs. Scoring Defense

LSU (17-36 ppg) vs. Oklahoma State (61-27 ppg)

Oklahoma State (2-49 ppg) vs. LSU (2-11 ppg)

2011 LSU wouldn't have had to throw a single pass. Incidentally, had Stanford used this tactic on the last drive, the game never goes to overtime.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat

Vidalia, La

Member since Nov 2013

4438 posts

Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:22 am to Bootycall

This is stupid, saying we would've easily beat them... While it certainly would have been more favorable for us to win, Okie Lite was really, really good that year and potentially could have rung up some serious points on us by half... On the other hand, we could've scored 3 defensive td's on them by half. We'll never know, and ppl downplaying OKST (or any top team that year) as nothing but a fly for us to swat is losing perspective on why they play the games. Lsu need to quit acting like Bama fans, and be a little more realistic.