Started By
Message
re: Gus Malzahn's Career: Always has been a winner, always will be a winner...
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:06 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:06 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
sabben 4-0 in Exhibition games that the participants are voted in to1.000 Perfection. gus 0-1 .0000000000000000
fixed.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:11 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
Leave it to a fellow Bama fan to figure it out. In the original post I also gave him credit for the Cam year (a player he'll never have again)
He'll also never have a clint moseley or barret trotter again, or a team that shitty.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:16 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:First, you said no such thing about Cam in the post I responded to. So quit lying.
Leave it to a fellow Bama fan to figure it out. In the original post I also gave him credit for the Cam year (a player he'll never have again). So in actuality it was 21, 28, and 0. Terrifying.
Second of all, if you type out "for the most part" please learn what it actually means.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:18 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:Again, the post I responded to said "his offenses played terrible for the most part." Now explain how 1 out of 4 games equals "the most part."
but you are being a bit biased here in forgetting to mention the time his offense put up 0 points in 2011
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:19 pm to joeyb147
1-4 is 3 so that's the most
THIS IS HOW IT HAPPENS
THIS IS HOW IT HAPPENS
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:19 pm to blzr
quote:But the offense that put up 0 points was coming off a national championship.
He'll also never have a clint moseley or barret trotter again, or a team that shitty.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:20 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
How many of those players started in the NC game?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:21 pm to joeyb147
quote:It is worth noting he was talking originally about the Chizik era. That was pretty clear from that post, so it's really 1 in 3.
1 out of 4
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:24 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:his original post on the subject
It is worth noting he was talking originally about the Chizik era. That was pretty clear from that post, so it's really 1 in 3.
quote:Now tell me what 4 years Malzahn was the OC at Auburn.
(for good reason as his offenses were sub-par in 3 of 4 years and they had Cam Newton for the other
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:27 pm to joeyb147
quote:
Again, the post I responded to said "his offenses played terrible for the most part." Now explain how 1 out of 4 games equals "the most part."
If you are going to continue to follow me around and quote me, at least get the quote correct. That's not what I said. I said they were sub-par, not terrible.there is a difference. But I understand how it helps you're argument if you misrepresent what I've said. They were sub-par. Look at the average points they point up for the year. Then look at the output in games against Saban.
This has been covered numerous time, deeply. Malzahn's offensive differential is much greater when he plays Saban than Saban's defensive mean differentials agains Malzahn's offense. By almost double IIRC.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:31 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:More lies.
That's not what I said. I said they were sub-par, not terrible.
quote:
when his offenses for the most part played terribly against Saban's defenses.
quote:Yes, I remember you using different criteria when doing the stats on it. Like using Saban's ppg when excluding D2 schools (defensive ppg goes up) but including that game for Malzahn (offensive ppg goes up) . And also including special teams scores and defensive scores in every game but the IB. Your Stat work was garbage and you disappeared when confronted about it.
This has been covered numerous time, deeply. Malzahn's offensive differential is much greater when he plays Saban than Saban's defensive mean differentials agains Malzahn's offense. By almost double IIRC.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:38 pm to joeyb147
See, the post this site has you originally replying wasn't that one, so it was pretty easy to see why I would assume you were talking about the other one.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:38 pm to joeyb147
quote:
More lies.
You dig yourself deeper with each post. I'll wait for you to go back and fix it again. (For the 3rd time).
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:42 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:And why would that matter even if it's the case? Is 1 out of 3 the most part now?
See, the post this site has you originally replying wasn't that one, so it was pretty easy to see why I would assume you were talking about the other one.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:44 pm to BamaDoc14
Typical response. Ignore the facts. Ignore your own errors and try to deflect.
Do you have anything of substance to add? Or is just throw shite against the wall and when you get called out play dumb?
Do you have anything of substance to add? Or is just throw shite against the wall and when you get called out play dumb?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:45 pm to joeyb147
Honestly, I wouldn't say the offense did really well in 2009. It was average. I didn't say terrible or even sub-par though.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:45 pm to joeyb147
quote:
Typical response. Ignore the facts. Ignore your own errors and try to deflect. Do you have anything of substance to add? Or is just throw shite against the wall and when you get called out play dumb?
Already added. Watching you misrepresent arguments/facts.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News