Started By
Message

re: Two Years In

Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by ATLabama
Member since Jan 2013
1602 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:31 pm to
I'd say A&M, but by a slim margin. Neither of them has actually won anything. So, after figuring that, you gotta go with, "who's brought the most visibility to the conference?" The easy answer is A&M.

JFF, Matthews, Evans were all first round picks in football. A&M was one of the must-see teams to watch. Mizzou brought visibility by winning a terrible East (though, they did beat A&M), and the spotlight of Michael Sam.

I'd say both did their part to bring visibility to the conference in football, with A&M having the slight edge. Honestly, the both had more value in that aspect than Mississippi State, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Vanderbilt and Arkansas have had in a while.

In baseball (which, really is a niche national sport), Mizzou might as well play softball. Edge to A&M. In basketball, I'm actually quite dissapointed in Mizzou in particular, as that program should have been the biggest asset to the conference.
Posted by braceUrSlf
Member since Sep 2013
43 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:34 pm to
Mizzou won the east. This isn't even close.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34348 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Honestly, the both had more value in that aspect than Mississippi State, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Vanderbilt and Arkansas have had in a while.


Thread
Posted by gohogs141
Fayetteville
Member since Jun 2011
7519 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Honestly, the both had more value in that aspect than Mississippi State, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Vanderbilt and Arkansas have had in a while.


2 years is a while?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter