Started By
Message
re: Oline Recruiting Discussion
Posted on 4/24/14 at 9:26 pm to Crowknowsbest
Posted on 4/24/14 at 9:26 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
A big part of this is that Bama has signed more players in general. That allows them to use a higher proportion of their scholarship on the offensive line without leaving other positions short-handed. Our OL roster spots are basically the same as all of our peers, but a few of our guys likely would have been processed at other places, allowing for more to be signed.
Their star ratings are just higher than everyone across the board.
So we can't have an O-line as good as Bama's because we don't cheat?
1
Posted on 4/24/14 at 9:28 pm to deeprig9
quote:
So we can't have an O-line as good as Bama's because we don't cheat?
It's not really cheating. We can have as good an O-Line, it's just less likely. We would have to hit on a higher percentage of our signees than they do.
They're having OL problems right now, too. OL recruit evaluation is a pretty inexact science.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News