Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:08 pm to MrAUTigers
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:08 pm to MrAUTigers
We get it, you had a good run in the 80's and an ok run in the early to mid 2000's.
This thread is for discussing the other 90 or so years of mediocrity and inconsistency.
This thread is for discussing the other 90 or so years of mediocrity and inconsistency.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 8:09 pm
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:11 pm to IAmReality
quote:
We get it, you had a good run in the 80's and an ok run in the early to mid 2000's. This thread is for discussing the other 90 or so years of mediocrity and inconsistency.
So after discovering that AU and Bama have the exact same record over the last few decades, you now want to talk about football that happened before everyone here was born?
A bad response thread.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:12 pm to IAmReality
quote:
This thread is for discussing the other 90 or so years of mediocrity and inconsistency.
That's just it. Your statement is total bullshite. Auburn has had some bad years. bama has had far more periods of getting down, and staying down, than Auburn has. Truthfully, bama has had two great era's. That is what you base the success of your entire history on.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News