Started By
Message
Why do people and writers from St. Louis (not all, but most) hate Mizzou?
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:00 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:02 pm to mizzoukills
No idea, but it's more fact than fiction.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:05 pm to mizzoukills
Good question. It's a wonder that Mizzou even has fans in St Louis based on some of the mizzou coverage I've seen from there.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:08 pm to mizzoukills
It is pretty pathetic the way they shite on Mizzou constantly.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:11 pm to mizzoukills
That hook is shiney.
And you are trolling your own board. For shame my brother, for shame.
ETA: Screw it. It's so quite in here you could hear a figurative mouse take a figurative shite
And you are trolling your own board. For shame my brother, for shame.
ETA: Screw it. It's so quite in here you could hear a figurative mouse take a figurative shite
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:12 pm to everytrueson
I figured with the Dave Matters hiring it would get better, but then they let Burwell say anything he wants. Its a joke and dont know why any Mizzou fan would read anything they put out.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:16 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
And you are trolling your own board. For shame my brother, for shame.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:17 pm to mizzoukills
Part of it as far as media is it just feels that way b/c STL is the biggest city in MO and we don't have a standard of comparison to other big city media in the state except KC, and any time negativity comes out of there we can all just shrug and say "meh, Beakers, whatchagonnado."
Fact is, even when writers or sports radio guys int the STL say negative or polarizing stuff about Mizzou *they are still paying attention to Mizzou* which is the biggest factor in big city markets and says most about how your program stacks up.
Consider - as big and influential as the University of Texas is, does it even come *close* to owning the Dallas-Fort Worth media market even compared to other colleges much less sports talk in general? Oh hellz no. Even OU and Okie State get lots and lots of run in the media there. Ask an Illini fan what the Chicago media (and people in Chicago generally) situation is like for them. In terms of both overall attention paid and in terms of amount of good publicity, Mizzou gets much more of both per capita in STL than the University of Illinois ever has and ever will get in Chicagoland. And don't even bother telling our STL sob stories to a fan of some NY or Cali program who lives in NYC or LA.
STL has 2 million peeps in its metro area. A lot of them are Mizzou fans. A lot of them are not. Some of the ones who are not actually hate Mizzou. Such is life. But its par for the course in larger cities.
Fact is, even when writers or sports radio guys int the STL say negative or polarizing stuff about Mizzou *they are still paying attention to Mizzou* which is the biggest factor in big city markets and says most about how your program stacks up.
Consider - as big and influential as the University of Texas is, does it even come *close* to owning the Dallas-Fort Worth media market even compared to other colleges much less sports talk in general? Oh hellz no. Even OU and Okie State get lots and lots of run in the media there. Ask an Illini fan what the Chicago media (and people in Chicago generally) situation is like for them. In terms of both overall attention paid and in terms of amount of good publicity, Mizzou gets much more of both per capita in STL than the University of Illinois ever has and ever will get in Chicagoland. And don't even bother telling our STL sob stories to a fan of some NY or Cali program who lives in NYC or LA.
STL has 2 million peeps in its metro area. A lot of them are Mizzou fans. A lot of them are not. Some of the ones who are not actually hate Mizzou. Such is life. But its par for the course in larger cities.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:17 pm to reedus23
Reedus
ban me...
quote:
And you are trolling your own board. For shame my brother, for shame.
ban me...
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:29 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
ban me...
Not yet.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:30 pm to reedus23
reedus23
Guess I just need to resort to a porn bomb, get banned, and then reactivate an old alter.
Gotcha
quote:
Not yet.
Guess I just need to resort to a porn bomb, get banned, and then reactivate an old alter.
Gotcha
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:33 pm to mizzoukills
One thing that can't be overlooked is the fact that media everywhere latches onto negative stories.
Negativity sells.
That said, the Post has it out for Mizzou. It's weird.
Dave Matter has a different feel now that he's at the Post.
-----
Unrelated. But does anyone else think it's weird that almost every sports article on the Post has some glaring grammatical error?
A misspelled word, double word, missing word ect.
I can understand these guys fire out articles, but you'd think they'd re-read it once and make the correction.
It's not like they're part timers, they're supposed to be professionals.
-------
What do people think of alternative sites like Vivaelbirdo. For the most part these are volunteers, as I understand it, yet their stuff is more creative and better quality.
Negativity sells.
That said, the Post has it out for Mizzou. It's weird.
Dave Matter has a different feel now that he's at the Post.
-----
Unrelated. But does anyone else think it's weird that almost every sports article on the Post has some glaring grammatical error?
A misspelled word, double word, missing word ect.
I can understand these guys fire out articles, but you'd think they'd re-read it once and make the correction.
It's not like they're part timers, they're supposed to be professionals.
-------
What do people think of alternative sites like Vivaelbirdo. For the most part these are volunteers, as I understand it, yet their stuff is more creative and better quality.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:35 pm to mizzoukills
Because they only care about the cardinals
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:35 pm to mizzoukills
Hilarious sig pic. Quite shocking, really.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:37 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Because they only care about the cardinals
I swear the Cardinals pay them to be an unofficial arm of the PR department.
I find it hilarious that there was never a concern raised, or mention of the fact that Perralta hit just .239 in '12, and has hit under .260 3 out of the last 5 years.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:37 pm to mizzoukills
Based on your sig pic I might be moderately worried about that Royals/cards bet...
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:40 pm to everytrueson
I think kills must have a feeling about our next bball coach. That has to be it.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 12:40 pm to KCMIZSEC
quote:
Hilarious sig pic. Quite shocking, really.
Should we take the new sig to mean killz wants Gregg Marshall?
EDIT: less than a minute, KCMIZ, less than a minute.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 12:41 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News