Started By
Message
re: Mizzou Admits They F*cked Up Sexual Assault Case of Student Athlete
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:55 pm to kilo
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:55 pm to kilo
quote:
he fact your whole premise and narrative relies on that while completely ignoring the fact that the report clearly states there is no proof that there was contact with university personal outside of medical professionals.
No, you're wrong.
The report does not say that "there is no proof that there was contact with university personal [sp] outside of medical professionals."
In fact, the report details two pieces of evidence (or proof) that there was contact with university personnel outside of medical professionals.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
The second is the therapist's notes and revelation that the therapist's conclusion was that the conversation between Courey and Anderson involved the rape.
To rebut these two pieces of evidence, you have Anderson's statement that she did not recall, specifically, the words "rape" or "assault." She recalled being told that "bad things happened."
Adding these together, you get the real finding: No definitive conclusion, which is much different than "no proof."
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:58 pm
3
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:02 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
Adding these together, you get the real finding: No definitive conclusion, which is much different that "no proof."
This is correct.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:06 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
No, you're wrong.
Meh, if you say so Grits.
quote:
n fact, the report details two pieces of evidence (or proof) that there was contact with university personnel outside of medical professionals.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
The second is the therapist's notes and revelation that the therapist's conclusion was that the conversation between Courey and Anderson involved the rape.
Ok, then why this finding?
quote:
No definitive conclusion
Like I" said, you are giving far more weight to certain aspects then you are with others.
An independent investigation wasnt willing to call Anderson a "liar" but you sure are and with that is the basis for your soapbox ITT.
Give it a rest Grits.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:07 pm to JDHLaw
quote:Yes and the account was Anderson had no reaction.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
Anderson also stated that Courey said she didn't want to come back becuase 'bad things happened to me'. Anderson assumed that meant the attempted suicides, which given that she had not heard about anything else is a pretty reasonalbe assumption.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 10:08 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News