Started By
Message
re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:02 pm to beejon
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:02 pm to beejon
quote:
The mechanism is either atheistic, with no intelligence or design in the mechanism, or there's intelligence in the process, with design and meaning. The atheistic viewpoint promoted today in Darwinist evolutionary are guesses and suppositions with no allowance for dispute, no allowance for disagreement. The truth of the matter is, there's no support for complex and varied creation by randomness yet that's the accepted view of those who are blind and narrow minded, yet who call themselves enlightened scientists.
Evolution isn't a life philosophy. People who make it so are adding in more than just evolution.
Pure evolution is atheistic only in that it makes no mention of God and doesn't speak to him one way or the other.
As has been said, Darwin himself was a theist.
1
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:10 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Evolution isn't a life philosophy. People who make it so are adding in more than just evolution.
Atheistic Darwinist theory is definitely a life philosophy. One's existence and purpose is determined by the acceptance of the theory that our life is the result of random, purposeless, events and that our interaction with one another is, ultimately, based on the survival of the fittest.
quote:
Pure evolution is atheistic only in that it makes no mention of God and doesn't speak to him one way or the other.
Not true. Darwinist creationist evolution is inherently atheistic because it completely rejects any consideration that anything, other than random purposeless events, is the mechanism behind one's life and creation in general.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News