Started By
Message

re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution

Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:55 am to
Posted by beejon
University Of Louisiana Warhawks
Member since Nov 2008
7959 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

It produces mutations in DNA, mutations which are either deleterious, beneficial or have no effect either way.

Mutation doesn't produce new organisms. Selection does by selecting for advantageous traits in a very non-random manner.


The ultimate source is randomness though. Randomness is the driving impetus behind the creation of more and more complex life forms through selection. It's a hit and miss sort of creation.

The mechanism is either atheistic, with no intelligence or design in the mechanism, or there's intelligence in the process, with design and meaning. The atheistic viewpoint promoted today in Darwinist evolutionary are guesses and suppositions with no allowance for dispute, no allowance for disagreement. The truth of the matter is, there's no support for complex and varied creation by randomness yet that's the accepted view of those who are blind and narrow minded, yet who call themselves enlightened scientists.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29198 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

The mechanism is either atheistic, with no intelligence or design in the mechanism, or there's intelligence in the process, with design and meaning.


Again with this false dichotomy bullshite. Why are you ignoring me?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46626 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

The mechanism is either atheistic, with no intelligence or design in the mechanism, or there's intelligence in the process, with design and meaning. The atheistic viewpoint promoted today in Darwinist evolutionary are guesses and suppositions with no allowance for dispute, no allowance for disagreement. The truth of the matter is, there's no support for complex and varied creation by randomness yet that's the accepted view of those who are blind and narrow minded, yet who call themselves enlightened scientists.




Evolution isn't a life philosophy. People who make it so are adding in more than just evolution.

Pure evolution is atheistic only in that it makes no mention of God and doesn't speak to him one way or the other.

As has been said, Darwin himself was a theist.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter