Started By
Message

re: Southern Hockey Fans

Posted on 4/2/14 at 9:08 pm to
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
55240 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Syracuse LINK and Pitt LINK don't have programs


Looks like they do to me

As for attendance :

1 B1G Minnesota 11,553
2 North Dakota 11,338
3 B1G Wisconsin 10,478
4 Colorado College 6,420
5 Nebraska-Omaha 6,331
6 Minnesota-Duluth 6,183
7 ACC Boston College 6,116
8 B1G Penn State 6,011
9 B1G Michigan 5,582
10 Michigan State 5,392
11 Denver 5,137
12 Massachusetts-Lowell 5,047
13 New Hampshire 4,992
14 ACC Notre Dame 4,816
15 B1G Ohio State 4,576
16 St. Cloud State 4,501
17 Boston University 4,112
18 Maine 4,092
19 Cornell 4,088
20 Massachusetts 3,891

Looking at attendance baseball and women's basketball draw better crowds. The issue is cost of production vs TV fill time in the time between football seasons. If the BTN is showing 6 hockey teams they are betting they will make more than it costs to produce, hence they make money. If the BTN uses the B1G then sooner or later ESPN will use the ACC to match product air time. BTN hockey = Coke, so ACC hockey = Pepsi. Coke has Dasani and Pepsi has Aquafina. As 1 develops a product line, so does the other to not lose shelf space.

You may know the game, but you don't know jack sh*t about markets and marketing.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 9:13 pm to
I believe that if UA had a NCAA hockey team, they would match our baseball attendance from the last few years.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

You may know the game, but you don't know jack sh*t about markets and marketing.



I think what he's saying is that Hockey East = Dr Pepper. They're not going to be destroyed no matter how dominant the others are. ACC Hockey doesn't = Pepsi, because it isn't Pepsi.

Trying to create Pepsi out of Dr. Pepper doesn't work, to use the stupid fricking analogy that's been set forth.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

Syracuse LINK and Pitt LINK don't have programs


Looks like they do to me



Those are club teams, it's not NCAA. It would require starting a program for them to compete at the NCAA level.

Just as Penn St is considered just a 2nd year program despite having club hockey for years.

I don't even know what to say in response to you sharing attendance, this is just about the dumbest dialogue I've ever been involved with.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter