Started By
Message
re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:36 pm to narddogg81
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:36 pm to narddogg81
You danced all the way around that point.
You cannot simultaneously depend upon a style of play that attempts to wear down other teams and complain about getting exhausted on defense and expect to be taken seriously.
You cannot simultaneously depend upon a style of play that attempts to wear down other teams and complain about getting exhausted on defense and expect to be taken seriously.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:41 pm to the808bass
quote:our style of play also allows the other team to substitute on defense pretty much at will, because we focus on trying to beat you with more skilled players and execution, not pre snap garbage. You are free to run whatever defense you think can stop us. Also, you sure changed gears after i destroyed you in the previous argument.
You cannot simultaneously depend upon a style of play that attempts to wear down other teams and complain about getting exhausted on defense and expect to be taken seriously.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:43 pm to the808bass
Substituting is as much about getting certain situational packages on the field (nickel/dime packages, goal-line packages, etc.) as it is about replacing fatigued players. Have you ever watched football?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)