Started By
Message
re: 2013 Auburn vs 2010 Auburn??
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:35 am to Zamoro10
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:35 am to Zamoro10
quote:
It's hard sell to most rational humans for Auburn to assert they would have ever won that matchup
It's hard to sell to people that Auburn could win any game...
Doesn't mean it's true...
2
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:11 am to Weagle25
IMO
2004 >> 2010 > 2013 > 1993
That 2004 squad was bad arse and loaded with talent on both sides. 2010 had an excellent line, Cam, and a couple of really good players on D.
This team and 1993 are both very good teams that somehow find a way to win.
2004 >> 2010 > 2013 > 1993
That 2004 squad was bad arse and loaded with talent on both sides. 2010 had an excellent line, Cam, and a couple of really good players on D.
This team and 1993 are both very good teams that somehow find a way to win.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:45 am to Weagle25
Well you're an Auburn fan - you will believe anything and support any falsehood - because hey, you're a fan.
But to neutrals - nobody in their right mind would ever and has ever believed Auburn would have given 2004 USC a game.
Which is why there has never been serious controversy about the "Auburn snub" - who cares? People say - didn't matter who USC played.
The post-season proved this on both ends.
But you can always print the shirts to this settled and ancient history.
But to neutrals - nobody in their right mind would ever and has ever believed Auburn would have given 2004 USC a game.
Which is why there has never been serious controversy about the "Auburn snub" - who cares? People say - didn't matter who USC played.
The post-season proved this on both ends.
But you can always print the shirts to this settled and ancient history.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News